dc.contributor.author |
Sasaki, Eri |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Overall, Nickola |
|
dc.coverage.spatial |
Switzerland |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2022-05-16T21:07:45Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2022-05-16T21:07:45Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2020-10-12 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
(2020). International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(20), 7411-. |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
1661-7827 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
https://hdl.handle.net/2292/59249 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Interdependence and attachment models have identified felt security as a critical foundation for commitment by orientating individuals towards relationship-promotion rather than self-protection. However, partners' security also signals the relative safety to commit to relationships. The current investigation adopted a dyadic perspective to examine whether partners' security acts as a strong link by buffering the negative effects of actors' insecurity on daily commitment. Across two daily diary studies (Study 1, N = 78 dyads and Study 2, N = 73 dyads), actors' X partners' daily felt security interactions revealed a strong-link pattern: lower actors' felt security on a given day predicted lower daily commitment, but these reductions were mitigated when partners reported higher levels of felt security that day. Actors' X partners' trait insecurity (attachment anxiety) interaction also showed this strong-link pattern in Study 1 but not Study 2. The results suggest that partners' felt security can help individuals experiencing insecurity overcome their self-protective impulses and feel safe enough to commit to their relationship on a daily basis. |
|
dc.format.medium |
Electronic |
|
dc.language |
eng |
|
dc.publisher |
MDPI AG |
|
dc.relation.ispartofseries |
International journal of environmental research and public health |
|
dc.rights |
Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. |
|
dc.rights.uri |
https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm |
|
dc.rights.uri |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
|
dc.subject |
Humans |
|
dc.subject |
Emotions |
|
dc.subject |
Anxiety |
|
dc.subject |
Interpersonal Relations |
|
dc.subject |
Sexual Partners |
|
dc.subject |
attachment anxiety |
|
dc.subject |
commitment |
|
dc.subject |
dyadic |
|
dc.subject |
felt security |
|
dc.subject |
strong link |
|
dc.subject |
2 Zero Hunger |
|
dc.subject |
Science & Technology |
|
dc.subject |
Life Sciences & Biomedicine |
|
dc.subject |
Environmental Sciences |
|
dc.subject |
Public, Environmental & Occupational Health |
|
dc.subject |
Environmental Sciences & Ecology |
|
dc.subject |
INTEGRATIVE DATA-ANALYSIS |
|
dc.subject |
ATTACHMENT STYLE |
|
dc.subject |
CLOSE RELATIONSHIPS |
|
dc.subject |
ADULT ATTACHMENT |
|
dc.subject |
WORKING MODELS |
|
dc.subject |
RELATIONSHIP STABILITY |
|
dc.subject |
ROMANTIC RELATIONSHIPS |
|
dc.subject |
RELATIONSHIP QUALITY |
|
dc.subject |
SATISFACTION |
|
dc.subject |
PERCEPTIONS |
|
dc.title |
A Dyadic Perspective of Felt Security: Does Partners' Security Buffer the Effects of Actors' Insecurity on Daily Commitment? |
|
dc.type |
Journal Article |
|
dc.identifier.doi |
10.3390/ijerph17207411 |
|
pubs.issue |
20 |
|
pubs.begin-page |
7411 |
|
pubs.volume |
17 |
|
dc.date.updated |
2022-04-04T18:51:27Z |
|
dc.rights.holder |
Copyright: The author |
en |
dc.identifier.pmid |
33053727 (pubmed) |
|
pubs.author-url |
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33053727 |
|
pubs.publication-status |
Published |
|
dc.rights.accessrights |
http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/OpenAccess |
en |
pubs.subtype |
research-article |
|
pubs.subtype |
Journal Article |
|
pubs.elements-id |
823340 |
|
pubs.org-id |
Science |
|
pubs.org-id |
Psychology |
|
dc.identifier.eissn |
1660-4601 |
|
dc.identifier.pii |
ijerph17207411 |
|
pubs.number |
ARTN 7411 |
|
pubs.record-created-at-source-date |
2022-04-05 |
|
pubs.online-publication-date |
2020-10-12 |
|