Experience with Quality Assurance in Two Store-and-Forward Telemedicine Networks.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Wootton, Richard
dc.contributor.author Liu, Joanne
dc.contributor.author Bonnardot, Laurent
dc.contributor.author Venugopal, Raghu
dc.contributor.author Oakley, Amanda
dc.coverage.spatial Switzerland
dc.date.accessioned 2022-05-17T23:22:42Z
dc.date.available 2022-05-17T23:22:42Z
dc.date.issued 2015-01
dc.identifier.citation (2015). Frontiers in Public Health, 3(NOV), 261-.
dc.identifier.issn 2296-2565
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/2292/59311
dc.description.abstract Despite the increasing use of telemedicine around the world, little has been done to incorporate quality assurance (QA) into these operations. The purpose of the present study was to examine the feasibility of QA in store-and-forward teleconsulting using a previously published framework. During a 2-year study period, we examined the feasibility of using QA tools in two mature telemedicine networks [Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) and New Zealand Teledermatology (NZT)]. The tools included performance reporting to assess trends, automated follow-up of patients to obtain outcomes data, automated surveying of referrers to obtain user feedback, and retrospective assessment of randomly selected cases to assess quality. In addition, the senior case coordinators in each network were responsible for identifying potential adverse events from email reports received from users. During the study period, there were 149 responses to the patient follow-up questions relating to the 1241 MSF cases (i.e., 12% of cases), and there were 271 responses to the follow-up questions relating to the 639 NZT cases (i.e., 42% of cases). The collection of user feedback reports was combined with the collection of patient follow-up data, thus producing the same response rates. The outcomes data suggested that the telemedicine advice proved useful for the referring doctor in the majority of cases and was likely to benefit the patient. The user feedback was overwhelmingly positive, over 90% of referrers in the two networks finding the advice received to be of educational benefit. The feedback also suggested that the teleconsultation had provided cost savings in about 20% of cases, either to the patient/family, or to the hospital/clinic treating the patient. Various problems were detected by regular monitoring, and certain adverse events were identified from email reports by the users. A single aberrant quality reading was detected by using a process control chart. The present study demonstrates that a QA program is feasible in store-and-forward telemedicine, and shows that it was useful in two different networks, because certain problems were detected (and then solved) that would not have been identified until much later. It seems likely that QA could be used much more widely in telemedicine generally to benefit patient care.
dc.format.medium Electronic-eCollection
dc.language eng
dc.publisher Frontiers Media SA
dc.relation.ispartofseries Frontiers in public health
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher.
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject LMICs
dc.subject quality assurance
dc.subject quality control
dc.subject telehealth
dc.subject telemedicine
dc.subject Networking and Information Technology R&D
dc.subject Clinical Research
dc.subject Science & Technology
dc.subject Life Sciences & Biomedicine
dc.subject Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
dc.subject 1117 Public Health and Health Services
dc.title Experience with Quality Assurance in Two Store-and-Forward Telemedicine Networks.
dc.type Journal Article
dc.identifier.doi 10.3389/fpubh.2015.00261
pubs.issue NOV
pubs.begin-page 261
pubs.volume 3
dc.date.updated 2022-04-18T21:08:16Z
dc.rights.holder Copyright: The author en
dc.identifier.pmid 26870720 (pubmed)
pubs.author-url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26870720
pubs.publication-status Published
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/OpenAccess en
pubs.subtype research-article
pubs.subtype Journal Article
pubs.elements-id 680419
pubs.org-id Medical and Health Sciences
pubs.org-id School of Medicine
pubs.org-id Medicine Department
dc.identifier.eissn 2296-2565
pubs.number ARTN 261
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2022-04-19
pubs.online-publication-date 2015-11-26


Files in this item

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics