dc.contributor.author |
Klem, Nardia-Rose |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Wild, Catherine Y |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Williams, Sian A |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Ng, Leo |
|
dc.coverage.spatial |
United States |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2022-06-20T00:16:21Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2022-06-20T00:16:21Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2017-03 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
(2017). American Journal of Sports Medicine, 45(3), 685-691. |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
0363-5465 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
https://hdl.handle.net/2292/60005 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
<h4>Background</h4>Despite the high prevalence of lower extremity injuries in female basketball players as well as a high proportion of athletes who wear ankle braces, there is a paucity of research pertaining to the effects of ankle bracing on ankle and knee biomechanics during basketball-specific tasks.<h4>Purpose</h4>To compare the effects of a lace-up brace (ASO), a hinged brace (Active T2), and no ankle bracing (control) on ankle and knee joint kinematics and joint reaction forces in female basketball athletes during a cutting maneuver.<h4>Study design</h4>Controlled laboratory study.<h4>Methods</h4>Twenty healthy, semi-elite female basketball players performed a cutting task under both ankle brace conditions (lace-up ankle brace and hinged ankle brace) and a no-brace condition. The 3-dimensional kinematics of the ankle and knee during the cutting maneuver were measured with an 18-camera motion analysis system (250 Hz), and ground-reaction force data were collected by use of a multichannel force plate (2000 Hz) to quantify ankle and knee joint reaction forces. Conditions were randomized using a block randomization method.<h4>Results</h4>Compared with the control condition, the hinged ankle brace significantly restricted peak ankle inversion (mean difference, 1.7°; P = .023). No significant difference was found between the lace-up brace and the control condition ( P = .865). Compared with the lace-up brace, the hinged brace significantly reduced ankle and knee joint compressive forces at the time of peak ankle dorsiflexion (mean difference, 1.5 N/kg [ P = .018] and 1.4 N/kg [ P = .013], respectively). Additionally, the hinged ankle brace significantly reduced knee anterior shear forces compared with the lace-up brace both during the deceleration phase and at peak ankle dorsiflexion (mean difference, 0.8 N/kg [ P = .018] and 0.9 N/kg [ P = .011], respectively).<h4>Conclusion</h4>The hinged ankle brace significantly reduced ankle inversion compared with the no-brace condition and reduced ankle and knee joint forces compared with the lace-up brace in a female basketball population during a cutting task. Compared with the lace-up brace, the hinged brace may be a better choice of prophylactic ankle support for female basketball players from a biomechanical perspective. However, both braces increased knee internal rotation and knee abduction angles, which may be problematic for a population that already has a high prevalence of knee injuries. |
|
dc.format.medium |
Print-Electronic |
|
dc.language |
eng |
|
dc.publisher |
SAGE Publications |
|
dc.relation.ispartofseries |
The American journal of sports medicine |
|
dc.rights |
Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. |
|
dc.rights.uri |
https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm |
|
dc.subject |
Ankle |
|
dc.subject |
Knee |
|
dc.subject |
Humans |
|
dc.subject |
Ankle Injuries |
|
dc.subject |
Equipment Design |
|
dc.subject |
Braces |
|
dc.subject |
Time and Motion Studies |
|
dc.subject |
Rotation |
|
dc.subject |
Basketball |
|
dc.subject |
Female |
|
dc.subject |
Young Adult |
|
dc.subject |
Biomechanical Phenomena |
|
dc.subject |
ASO ankle brace |
|
dc.subject |
Active T2 ankle brace |
|
dc.subject |
joint forces |
|
dc.subject |
kinematics |
|
dc.subject |
kinetics |
|
dc.subject |
lower limb |
|
dc.subject |
Rehabilitation |
|
dc.subject |
Bioengineering |
|
dc.subject |
Clinical Research |
|
dc.subject |
Prevention |
|
dc.subject |
Science & Technology |
|
dc.subject |
Life Sciences & Biomedicine |
|
dc.subject |
Orthopedics |
|
dc.subject |
Sport Sciences |
|
dc.subject |
CRUCIATE LIGAMENT INJURY |
|
dc.subject |
LOWER-EXTREMITY KINEMATICS |
|
dc.subject |
GROUND REACTION FORCES |
|
dc.subject |
HIGH-SCHOOL BASKETBALL |
|
dc.subject |
DROP LANDINGS |
|
dc.subject |
VOLLEYBALL PLAYERS |
|
dc.subject |
DORSIFLEXION RANGE |
|
dc.subject |
HIP-JOINT |
|
dc.subject |
RISK |
|
dc.subject |
1106 Human Movement and Sports Sciences |
|
dc.subject |
Clinical |
|
dc.subject |
0903 Biomedical Engineering |
|
dc.subject |
0913 Mechanical Engineering |
|
dc.title |
Effect of External Ankle Support on Ankle and Knee Biomechanics During the Cutting Maneuver in Basketball Players. |
|
dc.type |
Journal Article |
|
dc.identifier.doi |
10.1177/0363546516673988 |
|
pubs.issue |
3 |
|
pubs.begin-page |
685 |
|
pubs.volume |
45 |
|
dc.date.updated |
2022-05-29T21:33:15Z |
|
dc.rights.holder |
Copyright: The author |
en |
dc.identifier.pmid |
27872123 (pubmed) |
|
pubs.author-url |
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27872123 |
|
pubs.end-page |
691 |
|
pubs.publication-status |
Published |
|
dc.rights.accessrights |
http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/RestrictedAccess |
en |
pubs.subtype |
Journal Article |
|
pubs.elements-id |
817694 |
|
pubs.org-id |
Liggins Institute |
|
dc.identifier.eissn |
1552-3365 |
|
dc.identifier.pii |
0363546516673988 |
|
pubs.record-created-at-source-date |
2022-05-30 |
|
pubs.online-publication-date |
2016-11-24 |
|