Measurement of Upper Limb Range of Motion Using Wearable Sensors: A Systematic Review.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Walmsley, Corrin P
dc.contributor.author Williams, Sîan A
dc.contributor.author Grisbrook, Tiffany
dc.contributor.author Elliott, Catherine
dc.contributor.author Imms, Christine
dc.contributor.author Campbell, Amity
dc.coverage.spatial Switzerland
dc.date.accessioned 2022-06-21T21:40:19Z
dc.date.available 2022-06-21T21:40:19Z
dc.date.issued 2018-11-29
dc.identifier.citation (2018). Sports Medicine-Open, 4(1), 53-.
dc.identifier.issn 2199-1170
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/2292/60055
dc.description.abstract <h4>Background</h4>Wearable sensors are portable measurement tools that are becoming increasingly popular for the measurement of joint angle in the upper limb. With many brands emerging on the market, each with variations in hardware and protocols, evidence to inform selection and application is needed. Therefore, the objectives of this review were related to the use of wearable sensors to calculate upper limb joint angle. We aimed to describe (i) the characteristics of commercial and custom wearable sensors, (ii) the populations for whom researchers have adopted wearable sensors, and (iii) their established psychometric properties.<h4>Methods</h4>A systematic review of literature was undertaken using the following data bases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, IEEE, and Scopus. Studies were eligible if they met the following criteria: (i) involved humans and/or robotic devices, (ii) involved the application or simulation of wearable sensors on the upper limb, and (iii) calculated a joint angle.<h4>Results</h4>Of 2191 records identified, 66 met the inclusion criteria. Eight studies compared wearable sensors to a robotic device and 22 studies compared to a motion analysis system. Commercial (n = 13) and custom (n = 7) wearable sensors were identified, each with variations in placement, calibration methods, and fusion algorithms, which were demonstrated to influence accuracy.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Wearable sensors have potential as viable instruments for measurement of joint angle in the upper limb during active movement. Currently, customised application (i.e. calibration and angle calculation methods) is required to achieve sufficient accuracy (error <  5°). Additional research and standardisation is required to guide clinical application.<h4>Trial registration</h4>This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO ( CRD42017059935 ).
dc.format.medium Electronic
dc.language eng
dc.publisher Springer Science and Business Media LLC
dc.relation.ispartofseries Sports medicine - open
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher.
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject Inertial movement unit
dc.subject Joint angle
dc.subject Kinematics
dc.subject Motion analysis
dc.subject Upper limb
dc.subject Wearable sensor
dc.subject Clinical Research
dc.subject Bioengineering
dc.subject Science & Technology
dc.subject Life Sciences & Biomedicine
dc.subject Sport Sciences
dc.subject INERTIAL MEASUREMENT UNITS
dc.subject JOINT ANGLE TRACKING
dc.subject AMBULATORY MEASUREMENT
dc.subject ELBOW KINEMATICS
dc.subject SHOULDER
dc.subject REHABILITATION
dc.subject VALIDATION
dc.subject RELIABILITY
dc.subject REPEATABILITY
dc.subject BIOMECHANICS
dc.subject 0801 Artificial Intelligence and Image Processing
dc.title Measurement of Upper Limb Range of Motion Using Wearable Sensors: A Systematic Review.
dc.type Journal Article
dc.identifier.doi 10.1186/s40798-018-0167-7
pubs.issue 1
pubs.begin-page 53
pubs.volume 4
dc.date.updated 2022-05-29T21:28:37Z
dc.rights.holder Copyright: The author en
dc.identifier.pmid 30499058 (pubmed)
pubs.author-url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30499058
pubs.publication-status Published
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/OpenAccess en
pubs.subtype review-article
pubs.subtype Review
pubs.subtype Journal Article
pubs.elements-id 817704
pubs.org-id Liggins Institute
dc.identifier.eissn 2198-9761
dc.identifier.pii 10.1186/s40798-018-0167-7
pubs.number 53
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2022-05-30
pubs.online-publication-date 2018-11-29


Files in this item

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics