Differences in Scapular Orientation Between Standing and Sitting Postures at Rest and in 120° Scaption: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author McKenna, Leanda
dc.contributor.author Cornwall, Xavier
dc.contributor.author Williams, Sian
dc.coverage.spatial United States
dc.date.accessioned 2022-06-27T01:47:17Z
dc.date.available 2022-06-27T01:47:17Z
dc.date.issued 2017-06
dc.identifier.citation (2017). Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 9(6), 579-587.
dc.identifier.issn 1934-1482
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/2292/60156
dc.description.abstract <h4>Background</h4>Scapular orientation may be influenced by static body posture (sitting and standing) and contribute to the development of shoulder pain. Therefore, a consistent body posture should be considered when assessing scapular orientation as well as enhancing optimal scapular positioning.<h4>Objective</h4>To determine whether there are differences in scapular orientation between standing, neutral sitting, and habitual sitting, while adjusting for spinal posture.<h4>Design</h4>A single group randomized repeated measures study.<h4>Setting</h4>University laboratory.<h4>Participants</h4>Twenty-eight participants with shoulder pain were recruited from the community.<h4>Methods</h4>Scapular orientation between standing and seated positions was compared, with the arm by the side and at 120° of glenohumeral scaption. Thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis angles were used as covariates.<h4>Main outcome measurements</h4>Scapular elevation, lateral translation, upward rotation, and posterior tilt.<h4>Results</h4>Scapular orientation was marginally but significantly different between sitting postures for lateral translation (mean 0.5 cm; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.2-0.7 cm); P < .001), upward rotation (mean 3°; 95% CI 1.1-5.0°; P < .001), and posterior tilt (mean 2.3°; 95% CI 0.2-4.3°; P = .009) in the arm by side position. A small-but-significant difference between standing and neutral sitting was found for upward rotation (mean 1.8°; 95% CI 0-3.7°; P = .02), and between standing and habitual sitting for lateral translation (mean 0.6 cm; 95% CI 0-1.1 cm; P =.02) in the arm by side position.<h4>Conclusions</h4>The results of this study suggest that scapular orientation can be slightly affected by body posture, although the clinical relevance is uncertain. To enhance scapular upward rotation or posterior tilt, it may be preferable to place the patient in neutral sitting.<h4>Level of evidence</h4>Not applicable.
dc.format.medium Print-Electronic
dc.language eng
dc.publisher Wiley
dc.relation.ispartofseries PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher.
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm
dc.subject Scapula
dc.subject Shoulder Joint
dc.subject Humans
dc.subject Kyphosis
dc.subject Lordosis
dc.subject Shoulder Pain
dc.subject Range of Motion, Articular
dc.subject Risk Factors
dc.subject Cross-Sectional Studies
dc.subject Posture
dc.subject Adolescent
dc.subject Adult
dc.subject Middle Aged
dc.subject Female
dc.subject Male
dc.subject Young Adult
dc.subject Biomechanical Phenomena
dc.subject Clinical Research
dc.subject Rehabilitation
dc.subject Pain Research
dc.subject Science & Technology
dc.subject Life Sciences & Biomedicine
dc.subject Sport Sciences
dc.subject PREDICT SHOULDER PAIN
dc.subject LOWER-LIMB MOVEMENT
dc.subject SIT-TO-STAND
dc.subject LUMBAR SPINE
dc.subject SCAPULOHUMERAL RHYTHM
dc.subject IMPINGEMENT SYNDROME
dc.subject STATISTICAL POWER
dc.subject MUSCLE-ACTIVITY
dc.subject SAGITTAL SPINE
dc.subject CERVICAL-SPINE
dc.subject 1109 Neurosciences
dc.subject Clinical
dc.subject 1103 Clinical Sciences
dc.title Differences in Scapular Orientation Between Standing and Sitting Postures at Rest and in 120° Scaption: A Cross-Sectional Study.
dc.type Journal Article
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.pmrj.2016.09.010
pubs.issue 6
pubs.begin-page 579
pubs.volume 9
dc.date.updated 2022-05-29T21:26:32Z
dc.rights.holder Copyright: The author en
dc.identifier.pmid 27721004 (pubmed)
pubs.author-url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27721004
pubs.end-page 587
pubs.publication-status Published
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/RestrictedAccess en
pubs.subtype Comparative Study
pubs.subtype Journal Article
pubs.elements-id 817695
pubs.org-id Liggins Institute
dc.identifier.eissn 1934-1563
dc.identifier.pii S1934-1482(16)30968-6
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2022-05-30
pubs.online-publication-date 2016-10-06


Files in this item

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics