Abstract:
This thesis is a comparative study of lesbian-like women across three distinct
geographical contexts during the late Middle Ages. These contexts are
Confucian China, Dar al-Islam, and Latin Christendom. This thesis aims to shine
a light on an area of history that is often overlooked, that of the lesbian-like
woman, and further compare lesbian-like women of colour to their more
prominently studied white counterparts. From here an understanding of what
shared experiences lesbian-like women had across three radically different areas
can be gleaned. This thesis is divided into three chapters, which examine
authoritative sources as well as male- and female-authored texts. The first
chapter concludes that despite the varying types of authoritative sources found
across the three different contexts they all contribute to a global phallocentric
understanding of lesbianism. Regardless of the form of a given authoritative
source takes, lesbianism is always framed as phallocentric with the phallic
appropriation representing the ultimate transgression a lesbian-like woman
commits. The second chapter illustrates that male-authored texts, despite
presenting lesbian-like stories, end their tales with intense hetero-sexualization.
Lesbian-like behaviour is presented as a strange interlude which eventually ends
with a return to normalcy. The third chapter addresses the female perspective
through female-authored texts and concludes that female-only spaces became
de-facto lesbian-like spaces. Removed from the rigidity of patriarchal
expectations these women’s spaces, which they were forced into or praised for
entering willingly, gave women a general freedom which allowed for lesbian-like
behaviour to be pursued unhindered. Ultimately, this thesis illustrates that
lesbian-like women were subjugated like all women across these three distinct
cultures but lesbian-like women managed to thrive thanks to a unique apathy for
female-female interactions.