General hospital specialist attitudes toward psychiatry: a cross-sectional survey in seven countries

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Wimalaratne, IW
dc.contributor.author McCarthy, J
dc.contributor.author Broekman, BFP
dc.contributor.author Nauta, K
dc.contributor.author Kathriarachchi, S
dc.contributor.author Wickramasinghe, A
dc.contributor.author Merkin, A
dc.contributor.author Kursakov, A
dc.contributor.author Gross, R
dc.contributor.author Amsalem, D
dc.contributor.author Wang, X
dc.contributor.author Wang, J
dc.contributor.author Dantas, C
dc.contributor.author Pereira, V
dc.contributor.author Menkes, DB
dc.coverage.spatial virtual
dc.date.accessioned 2022-07-05T02:31:59Z
dc.date.available 2022-07-05T02:31:59Z
dc.date.issued 2022-05-01
dc.identifier.citation Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists’ New Zealand conference, virtual, 16 May 2022-16 May 2022. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. 56: 171-172. 22 Sep 2021
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/2292/60255
dc.description.abstract AIM: Psychiatric comorbidities are common in physical illness and significantly affect health outcomes. Attitudes of general hospital doctors toward psychiatry are important as they influence referral patterns and quality of care. Little is known about these attitudes and their cultural correlates. The aim of this study was to identify attitudes toward psychiatry among general hospital specialists in relation to practice setting culture and various clinician factors (gender, age, seniority and specialty). METHOD: A cross-sectional, descriptive study was carried out in seven countries (New Zealand, China, Sri Lanka, Russia, Israel, Brazil, the Netherlands). Data were collected from senior medical staff of various disciplines using an updated version of Mayou and Smith’s (1986) self-administered questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 889 hospital doctors participated. While favourable attitudes toward both psychiatric consultation and management were endorsed by a majority, significant differences were also observed between countries. Subgroup differences were mostly confined to gender, acuity of practice setting, and specialty. For example, female doctors in Russia (χ2=7.7, p=0.0056), China (χ2=9.2, p=0.0025) and the Netherlands (χ2=5.7, p=0.0174) endorsed more positive attitudes compared to their male counterparts, but this gender effect was not replicated in the total sample. Chronic care specialists were overall more inclined to manage patients’ emotional problems compared to those working in acute care (χ2=70.8, p [adjusted] <0.0001), a significant finding seen also in individual countries (China, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Russia). Physicians were more favourably disposed toward psychiatry compared to other specialists, especially surgeons, in all countries except Israel. CONCLUSION: This study adds to evidence for the association of medical attitudes with individual clinician factors and demonstrates that the influence of these factors varies by country. Understanding these issues may help overcome disciplinary barriers and improve quality of care provided to general hospital patients.
dc.relation.ispartof Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists’ New Zealand conference
dc.relation.ispartofseries Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher.
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm
dc.subject Science & Technology
dc.subject Life Sciences & Biomedicine
dc.subject Psychiatry
dc.subject DOCTORS MANAGEMENT
dc.subject 11 Medical and Health Sciences
dc.subject 17 Psychology and Cognitive Sciences
dc.title General hospital specialist attitudes toward psychiatry: a cross-sectional survey in seven countries
dc.type Conference Item
pubs.begin-page 171
dc.date.updated 2022-06-09T09:03:38Z
dc.rights.holder Copyright: The author en
pubs.author-url https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/00048674221088686
pubs.end-page 172
pubs.publication-status Published
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/RestrictedAccess en
pubs.elements-id 884816
pubs.org-id Medical and Health Sciences
pubs.org-id School of Medicine
pubs.org-id Psychological Medicine Dept
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2022-06-09


Files in this item

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics