Uncovering social structures and informational prejudices to reduce inequity in delivery and uptake of new molecular technologies.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Filoche, Sara
dc.contributor.author Stone, Peter
dc.contributor.author Cram, Fiona
dc.contributor.author Bacharach, Sondra
dc.contributor.author Dowell, Anthony
dc.contributor.author Sika-Paotonu, Dianne
dc.contributor.author Beard, Angela
dc.contributor.author Ormandy, Judy
dc.contributor.author Buchanan, Christina
dc.contributor.author Thunders, Michelle
dc.contributor.author Dew, Kevin
dc.coverage.spatial England
dc.date.accessioned 2022-08-10T23:34:20Z
dc.date.available 2022-08-10T23:34:20Z
dc.date.issued 2020-11
dc.identifier.citation (2020). Journal of Medical Ethics, 46(11), 763-767.
dc.identifier.issn 0306-6800
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/2292/60763
dc.description.abstract Advances in molecular technologies have the potential to help remedy health inequities through earlier detection and prevention; if, however, their delivery and uptake (and therefore any benefits associated with such testing) are not more carefully considered, there is a very real risk that existing inequities in access and use will be further exacerbated. We argue this risk relates to the way that information and knowledge about the technology is both acquired and shared, or not, between health practitioners and their patients.A healthcare system can be viewed as a complex social network comprising individuals with different worldviews, hierarchies, professional cultures and subcultures and personal beliefs, both for those giving and receiving care. When healthcare practitioners are not perceived as knowledge equals, they would experience informational prejudices, and the result is that knowledge dissemination across and between them would be impeded. The uptake and delivery of a new technology may be inequitable as a result. Patients would also experience informational prejudice when they are viewed as not being able to understand the information that is presented to them, and information may be withheld.Informational prejudices driven by social relations and structures have thus far been underexplored in considering (in)equitable implementation and uptake of new molecular technologies. Every healthcare interaction represents an opportunity for experiencing informational prejudice, and with it the risk of being inappropriately informed for undertaking (or offering) such screening or testing. Making knowledge acquisition and information dissemination, and experiences of informational prejudice, explicit through sociologically framed investigations would extend our understandings of (in)equity, and offer ways to affect network relationships and structures that support equity in delivery and uptake.
dc.format.medium Print-Electronic
dc.language eng
dc.publisher BMJ
dc.relation.ispartofseries Journal of medical ethics
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher.
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subject Humans
dc.subject Prejudice
dc.subject Delivery of Health Care
dc.subject Professional - professional relationship
dc.subject genetic information
dc.subject informed consent
dc.subject quality of health care
dc.subject sociology
dc.subject Prevention
dc.subject Health Services
dc.subject Clinical Research
dc.subject Generic health relevance
dc.subject 1199 Other Medical and Health Sciences
dc.subject 1801 Law
dc.subject 2201 Applied Ethics
dc.title Uncovering social structures and informational prejudices to reduce inequity in delivery and uptake of new molecular technologies.
dc.type Journal Article
dc.identifier.doi 10.1136/medethics-2019-105734
pubs.issue 11
pubs.begin-page 763
pubs.volume 46
dc.date.updated 2022-07-24T22:51:00Z
dc.rights.holder Copyright: The authors en
dc.identifier.pmid 31911498 (pubmed)
pubs.author-url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31911498
pubs.end-page 767
pubs.publication-status Published
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/OpenAccess en
pubs.subtype research-article
pubs.subtype Journal Article
pubs.elements-id 793260
pubs.org-id Medical and Health Sciences
pubs.org-id Science
pubs.org-id Science Research
pubs.org-id Medical Sciences
pubs.org-id Nutrition
pubs.org-id School of Medicine
pubs.org-id Obstetrics and Gynaecology
pubs.org-id Maurice Wilkins Centre (2010-2014)
dc.identifier.eissn 1473-4257
dc.identifier.pii medethics-2019-105734
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2022-07-25
pubs.online-publication-date 2020-11


Files in this item

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics