The influence of mussel restoration on coastal carbon cycling.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Sea, Mallory A
dc.contributor.author Hillman, Jenny R
dc.contributor.author Thrush, Simon F
dc.coverage.spatial England
dc.date.accessioned 2022-09-19T00:53:28Z
dc.date.available 2022-09-19T00:53:28Z
dc.date.issued 2022-06-03
dc.identifier.citation (2022). Global Change Biology.
dc.identifier.issn 1354-1013
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/2292/61316
dc.description.abstract Increasing responsiveness to anthropogenic climate change and the loss of global shellfish ecosystems has heightened interest in the carbon storage and sequestration potential of bivalve-dominated systems. While coastal ecosystems are dynamic zones of carbon transformation and change, current uncertainties and notable heterogeneity in the benthic environment make it difficult to ascertain the climate change mitigation capacity of ongoing coastal restoration projects aimed at revitalizing benthic bivalve populations. In this study we sought to distinguish between direct and indirect effects of subtidal green-lipped mussels (Perna canaliculus) on carbon cycling, and combined published literature with in-situ experiments from restored beds to create a carbon budget for New Zealand's shellfish restoration efforts. A direct summation of biogenic calcification, community respiration, and sediment processes suggests a moderate carbon efflux (+100.1 to 179.6 g C m<sup>-2</sup>  year<sup>-1</sup> ) occurs as a result of recent restoration efforts, largely reflective of the heterotrophic nature of bivalves. However, an examination of indirect effects of restoration on benthic community metabolism and sediment dynamics suggests that beds achieve greater carbon fixation rates and support enhanced carbon burial compared to nearby sediments devoid of mussels. We discuss limitations to our first-order approximation and postulate how the significance of mussel restoration to carbon-related outcomes likely increases over longer timescales. Coastal restoration is often conducted to support the provisioning of many ecosystem services, and we propose here that shellfish restoration not be used as a single measure to offset carbon dioxide emissions, but rather used in tandem with other initiatives to recover a bundle of valued ecosystem services.
dc.format.medium Print-Electronic
dc.language eng
dc.publisher Wiley
dc.relation.ispartofseries Global change biology
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher.
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject benthic fluxes
dc.subject benthic-pelagic coupling
dc.subject bivalves
dc.subject blue carbon
dc.subject carbon
dc.subject carbon budget
dc.subject restoration
dc.subject soft-sediments
dc.subject subtidal
dc.subject 13 Climate Action
dc.subject 05 Environmental Sciences
dc.subject 06 Biological Sciences
dc.title The influence of mussel restoration on coastal carbon cycling.
dc.type Journal Article
dc.identifier.doi 10.1111/gcb.16287
dc.date.updated 2022-08-07T05:01:32Z
dc.rights.holder Copyright: The authors en
dc.identifier.pmid 35656817 (pubmed)
pubs.author-url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35656817
pubs.publication-status Published
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/OpenAccess en
pubs.subtype Journal Article
pubs.elements-id 907390
pubs.org-id Science
pubs.org-id Marine Science
dc.identifier.eissn 1365-2486
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2022-08-07
pubs.online-publication-date 2022-06-03


Files in this item

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics