Abstract:
Importance: Anorexia Nervosa (AN) is a debilitating illness with the highest mortality rate
of all mental disorders. With protracted illness linked to declining recovery rates, evidence
indicates prompt treatment in AN is a significant predictor of full recovery. Despite this,
specialist treatment remains scarce and inaccessible with funding limited to those severe in
presentation.
Objective: The Maudsley outpatient treatment for adult anorexia nervosa (MANTRA) is an
adult treatment of AN with demonstrated efficacy as a psychologist-led and guided self-help
treatment in RCTs. The current study sought to evaluate the feasibility of MANTRA as a
pure self-help workbook treatment for mild to subthreshold adult AN.
Design: The study was an open consecutive case-series feasibility study. Eligible adults with
a diagnosis of mild to subthreshold AN without specialist treatment history were recruited
through G.P.s, community settings and website between 2020 and 2021.
Intervention: Participants received a specialist psychological self-help workbook
(MANTRA) for AN containing 10 treatment modules. A suggested reading schedule was
provided, no additional guidance was given.
Main outcomes and measures: Primary outcomes were 12-week change in AN case status
measured by DSM-5 Structured Clinical Interview and AN symptomology measured by the
EDE-Q. Secondary outcomes included 12-week and 24-week change on clinical impairment,
general psychopathology and decisional balance measured using the CIA, DASS-21 and DB.
Other outcomes included participant evaluation regarding treatment credibility, acceptability
and perceived effectiveness.
Results: A total of 8 participants completed the study and 38% of participants were reclassified
to a milder AN case status at discharge. Statistically significant results were yielded using
paired calculations before and after on AN symptomology (measured by EDE-Q) with large effect-sizes (d = 0.86). Significant reductions were also observed in clinical impairment at 12-
weeks (z = -1.96, p = .05). No significant changes were observed on the DASS-21 or DB. The
intervention was well rated for acceptability, practicality, and expansion by participants.
Conclusions and Relevance: Limited findings suggest that the workbook is feasible and
may improve AN case-status symptomology and clinical impairment. Less conclusive
evidence was found for general psychopathology and decisional balance. Further RCTs are
required to imply cause and effect.