Ease and comfort of pre-oxygenation with high-flow nasal oxygen cannulae vs. facemask: a randomised controlled trial.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Merry, AF
dc.contributor.author van Waart, H
dc.contributor.author Allen, SJ
dc.contributor.author Baker, PA
dc.contributor.author Cumin, D
dc.contributor.author Frampton, CMA
dc.contributor.author Gargiulo, DA
dc.contributor.author Hannam, JA
dc.contributor.author Keogh, GF
dc.contributor.author Moore, MR
dc.contributor.author Payton, M
dc.contributor.author Mitchell, SJ
dc.coverage.spatial England
dc.date.accessioned 2023-02-10T01:59:36Z
dc.date.available 2023-02-10T01:59:36Z
dc.date.issued 2022-12
dc.identifier.citation (2022). Anaesthesia, 77(12), 1346-1355.
dc.identifier.issn 0003-2409
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/2292/62756
dc.description.abstract The Difficult Airway Society recommends that all patients should be pre-oxygenated before the induction of general anaesthesia, but this may not always be easy or comfortable and anaesthesia may often be induced without full pre-oxygenation. We tested the hypothesis that high-flow nasal oxygen cannulae would be easier and more comfortable than facemasks for pre-oxygenation. We randomly allocated 199 patients undergoing elective surgery aged ≥ 10 years to pre-oxygenation using either high-flow nasal oxygen or facemask. Ease and comfort were assessed by anaesthetists and patients on 10-cm visual analogue scale and six-point smiley face scale, respectively. Secondary endpoints included end-tidal oxygen fraction after securing a definitive airway and time to secure an airway. A mean difference (95%CI) between groups in ratings of -0.76 (-1.25 to -0.27) cm for ease of use (p = 0.003) and -0.45 (-0.75 to -0.13) points for comfort (p = 0.006), both favoured high-flow nasal oxygen. A mean difference (95%CI) between groups in end-tidal oxygen fraction of 3.89% (2.41-5.37%) after securing a definitive airway also favoured high-flow nasal oxygen (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between groups in the number of patients with hypoxaemia (S<sub>p</sub> O<sub>2</sub>  < 90%) or severe hypoxaemia (S<sub>p</sub> O<sub>2</sub>  < 85%) lasting ≥ 1 min or ≥ 2 min; in the proportion of patients with an end-tidal oxygen fraction < 87% in the first 5 min after tracheal intubation (52.2% vs. 58.9% in facemask and high-flow nasal oxygen groups, respectively; p = 0.31); or in time taken to secure an airway (11.6 vs. 12.2 min in facemask and high-flow nasal oxygen groups, respectively; p = 0.65). In conclusion, we found pre-oxygenation with high-flow nasal oxygen to be easier for anaesthetists and more comfortable for patients than pre-oxygenation with a facemask, with no clinically relevant differences in end-tidal oxygen fraction after securing a definitive airway or time to secure an airway. The differences in ease and comfort were modest.
dc.format.medium Print-Electronic
dc.language eng
dc.publisher Wiley
dc.relation.ispartofseries Anaesthesia
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher.
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject Humans
dc.subject Oxygen
dc.subject Oxygen Inhalation Therapy
dc.subject Administration, Intranasal
dc.subject Masks
dc.subject Hypoxia
dc.subject Cannula
dc.subject airway management
dc.subject high-flow nasal oxygenation
dc.subject pre-oxygenation
dc.subject transnasal humidified rapid-insufflation ventilatory exchange (THRIVE)
dc.subject Lung
dc.subject Respiratory
dc.subject 1103 Clinical Sciences
dc.subject 1109 Neurosciences
dc.title Ease and comfort of pre-oxygenation with high-flow nasal oxygen cannulae vs. facemask: a randomised controlled trial.
dc.type Journal Article
dc.identifier.doi 10.1111/anae.15853
pubs.issue 12
pubs.begin-page 1346
pubs.volume 77
dc.date.updated 2023-01-26T00:21:08Z
dc.rights.holder Copyright: The authors en
dc.identifier.pmid 36110039 (pubmed)
pubs.author-url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36110039
pubs.end-page 1355
pubs.publication-status Published
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/OpenAccess en
pubs.subtype research-article
pubs.subtype Randomized Controlled Trial
pubs.subtype Journal Article
pubs.elements-id 919979
pubs.org-id Medical and Health Sciences
pubs.org-id Medical Sciences
pubs.org-id Pharmacology
pubs.org-id Pharmacy
pubs.org-id School of Medicine
pubs.org-id Anaesthesiology
dc.identifier.eissn 1365-2044
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2023-01-26
pubs.online-publication-date 2022-09-15


Files in this item

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics