Knowledge and decisions about maternal immunisation by pregnant women in Aotearoa New Zealand.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Young, Amber
dc.contributor.author Charania, Nadia A
dc.contributor.author Gauld, Natalie
dc.contributor.author Norris, Pauline
dc.contributor.author Turner, Nikki
dc.contributor.author Willing, Esther
dc.coverage.spatial England
dc.date.accessioned 2023-04-20T01:45:10Z
dc.date.available 2023-04-20T01:45:10Z
dc.date.issued 2022-06
dc.identifier.citation (2022). BMC Health Services Research, 22(1), 779-.
dc.identifier.issn 1472-6963
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/2292/63740
dc.description.abstract <h4>Background</h4>Maternal vaccinations for influenza and pertussis are recommended in New Zealand to protect mothers and their infant from infection. However, maternal immunisation coverage in New Zealand is suboptimal. Furthermore, there is unacceptable inequitable maternal immunisation rates across the country with Māori and Pacific women having significantly lower maternal immunisation rates than those of other New Zealanders.<h4>Methods</h4>This research set out to explore what pregnant/recently pregnant Māori and Pacific women knew about immunisation during pregnancy and what factors influenced their decision to be vaccinated. A semi-structured interview guide was developed with questions focusing on knowledge of pertussis and influenza vaccination during pregnancy and decision-making. Māori and Pacific women aged over 16 years were purposively sampled and interviewed in Dunedin and Gisborne, New Zealand between May and August 2021. Interviews were analysed following a directed qualitative content approach. Data were arranged into coding nodes based on the study aims (deductive analysis) informed by previous literature and within these participant experiences were inductively coded into themes and subthemes.<h4>Results</h4>Not all women were aware of maternal vaccine recommendations or they diseases they protected against. Many underestimated how dangerous influenza and pertussis could be and some were more concerned about potential harms of the vaccine. Furthermore, understanding potential harms of infection and protection provided by vaccination did not necessarily mean women would choose to be vaccinated. Those who decided to vaccinate felt well-informed, had vaccination recommended by their healthcare provider, and did so to protect their and their infant's health. Those who decided against vaccination were concerned about safety of the vaccines, lacked the information they needed, were not offered the vaccine, or did not consider vaccination a priority.<h4>Conclusions</h4>There is a lack of understanding about vaccine benefits and risks of vaccine-preventable diseases which can result in the reinforcement of negative influences such as the fear of side effects. Furthermore, if vaccine benefits are not understood, inaccessibility of vaccines and the precedence of other life priorities may prevent uptake. Being well-informed and supported to make positive decisions to vaccinate in pregnancy is likely to improve vaccine coverage in Māori and Pacific Island New Zealanders.
dc.format.medium Electronic
dc.language eng
dc.publisher Springer Nature
dc.relation.ispartofseries BMC health services research
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher.
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject Humans
dc.subject Whooping Cough
dc.subject Pregnancy Complications, Infectious
dc.subject Pertussis Vaccine
dc.subject Influenza Vaccines
dc.subject Immunization
dc.subject Vaccination
dc.subject Mothers
dc.subject Pregnancy
dc.subject Infant
dc.subject Pregnant Women
dc.subject New Zealand
dc.subject Female
dc.subject Influenza, Human
dc.subject Health inequity
dc.subject Informed choice
dc.subject Maternal immunisation
dc.subject Maternal vaccination
dc.subject Māori health
dc.subject Pacific health
dc.subject Infectious Diseases
dc.subject Pneumonia & Influenza
dc.subject Clinical Research
dc.subject Biodefense
dc.subject Emerging Infectious Diseases
dc.subject Prevention
dc.subject Influenza
dc.subject Vaccine Related
dc.subject 3 Prevention of disease and conditions, and promotion of well-being
dc.subject 3.4 Vaccines
dc.subject Reproductive health and childbirth
dc.subject Infection
dc.subject 3 Good Health and Well Being
dc.subject 0807 Library and Information Studies
dc.subject 1110 Nursing
dc.subject 1117 Public Health and Health Services
dc.title Knowledge and decisions about maternal immunisation by pregnant women in Aotearoa New Zealand.
dc.type Journal Article
dc.identifier.doi 10.1186/s12913-022-08162-4
pubs.issue 1
pubs.begin-page 779
pubs.volume 22
dc.date.updated 2023-03-17T03:00:09Z
dc.rights.holder Copyright: The authors en
dc.identifier.pmid 35698133 (pubmed)
pubs.author-url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35698133
pubs.publication-status Published
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/OpenAccess en
pubs.subtype research-article
pubs.subtype Journal Article
pubs.elements-id 911269
pubs.org-id Medical and Health Sciences
pubs.org-id Population Health
pubs.org-id Gen.Practice& Primary Hlthcare
pubs.org-id School of Medicine
pubs.org-id Paediatrics Child & Youth Hlth
dc.identifier.eissn 1472-6963
dc.identifier.pii 10.1186/s12913-022-08162-4
pubs.number 779
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2023-03-17
pubs.online-publication-date 2022-06-14


Files in this item

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics