Comparative Analysis of Lumbar Spine Vertebral Morphology Between Māori and New Zealand Europeans: A Computed Tomography Study.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Cook, William H
dc.contributor.author Baker, Joseph F
dc.coverage.spatial Netherlands
dc.date.accessioned 2023-04-24T01:30:12Z
dc.date.available 2023-04-24T01:30:12Z
dc.date.issued 2021-12
dc.identifier.citation (2021). The International Journal of Spine Surgery, 15(6), 1072-1081.
dc.identifier.issn 2211-4599
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/2292/63851
dc.description.abstract <h4>Background</h4>Most existing studies of lumbar anatomy do not consider ethnic influence and recruit mostly white participants. Recent studies have considered other populations; however, none have assessed Māori, the indigenous people of New Zealand (NZ). A computed tomography study of vertebral body (VB) and canal dimensions was performed for lumbar vertebrae of Māori and NZ European patients to evaluate for ethnic variation.<h4>Methods</h4>Lumbar vertebrae from 196 patients were measured using computed tomography. After interrater and intrarater reliability analyses, a single trained examiner measured VB heights, VB lengths, segmental angle, pedicle height and width, and vertebral canal length (VCL) and vertebral canal width for each level. Canal:body ratio was calculated. Demographic data recorded included age, sex, and ethnicity.<h4>Results</h4>VCL remained relatively constant through the lumbar spine; canal width increased to a maximum of 28.2 mm at L5. Canal:body ratios and pedicle height decreased while pedicle width increased to a maximum of 16.1 mm at L5. There were few differences between Māori and NZ Europeans except at the L5 level, where VCL and canal:body ratio were larger in NZ Europeans (<i>P</i> < 0.05), and pedicle height, width, and VB pediculolaminar length were larger in Māori (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Females had generally smaller measurements and age was a positive predictor of measured values (<i>P</i> < 0.05).<h4>Conclusions</h4>This study is the first to characterize lumbar anatomy in a Māori cohort. Adequately powered results demonstrated few differences between Māori and NZ Europeans. Isolated differences observed at L5 may be due to sacropelvic differences, which represent an area for further investigation.<h4>Level of evidence</h4>3.<h4>Clinical relevance</h4>Diagnosis, surgical planning, ethnic differences.
dc.format.medium Print
dc.language eng
dc.publisher International Journal of Spine Surgery
dc.relation.ispartofseries International journal of spine surgery
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher.
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm
dc.subject ethnic groups
dc.subject lumbar vertebrae
dc.subject spinal canal
dc.subject tomography
dc.subject x-ray computed
dc.subject Biomedical Imaging
dc.subject Science & Technology
dc.subject Life Sciences & Biomedicine
dc.subject Surgery
dc.subject PEDICLE MORPHOMETRY
dc.subject INDIAN POPULATION
dc.subject STENOSIS
dc.subject DIMENSIONS
dc.subject BODY
dc.subject OSTEOMETRY
dc.subject RATIO
dc.subject 1109 Neurosciences
dc.title Comparative Analysis of Lumbar Spine Vertebral Morphology Between Māori and New Zealand Europeans: A Computed Tomography Study.
dc.type Journal Article
dc.identifier.doi 10.14444/8193
pubs.issue 6
pubs.begin-page 1072
pubs.volume 15
dc.date.updated 2023-03-16T07:52:52Z
dc.rights.holder Copyright: The authors en
dc.identifier.pmid 35078879 (pubmed)
pubs.author-url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35078879
pubs.end-page 1081
pubs.publication-status Published
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/RetrictedAccess en
pubs.subtype research-article
pubs.subtype Journal Article
pubs.elements-id 881578
pubs.org-id Medical and Health Sciences
pubs.org-id School of Medicine
dc.identifier.eissn 2211-4599
dc.identifier.pii 15/6/1072
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2023-03-16
pubs.online-publication-date 2022-01-25


Files in this item

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics