Feasibility and Provisional Efficacy of Embedding High-Intensity Interval Training Into Physical Education Lessons: A Pilot Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Harris, Nigel
dc.contributor.author Warbrick, Isaac
dc.contributor.author Atkins, Denise
dc.contributor.author Vandal, Alain
dc.contributor.author Plank, Lindsay
dc.contributor.author Lubans, David R
dc.coverage.spatial United States
dc.date.accessioned 2023-05-10T04:34:26Z
dc.date.available 2023-05-10T04:34:26Z
dc.date.issued 2021-08
dc.identifier.citation (2021). Pediatric Exercise Science, 33(4), 186-195.
dc.identifier.issn 0899-8493
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/2292/63982
dc.description.abstract <h4>Purpose</h4>The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of generalist school teachers delivering curriculum connected high-intensity interval training in a school's physical education class time.<h4>Method</h4>Two schools volunteered to participate. A total of 84 students (11.9 [0.5] y, M = 64 and F = 19) volunteered to participate. Four classes from 2 schools were randomized to either intervention (n = 53) or control (n = 31) for one school term (8 wk). Intervention class teachers participated in a 1-day workshop instructing them how to deliver twice weekly, high-intensity interval training sessions. The control classes continued with their usual physical education curriculum. Recruitment, intervention fidelity, and program satisfaction were assessed. Preliminary efficacy (primary outcome cardiorespiratory fitness) was quantified using generalized linear mixed models, expressed as effect size. A range of secondary outcomes was also assessed.<h4>Results</h4>The recruitment rate was 88%. About 84% of the sessions were delivered. The heart rate peak over all sessions was 89.6% (13%) of the predicted maximum. The intervention teachers reported high levels of satisfaction. Almost all student participants were positive about participating. No adverse events occurred. The adjusted between-group difference for cardiorespiratory fitness was trivial (effect size 0.02).<h4>Conclusions</h4>This teacher-delivered high-intensity interval training program was feasible and acceptable to both teachers and student participants. It is therefore potentially scalable.
dc.format.medium Electronic
dc.language eng
dc.publisher Human Kinetics
dc.relation.ispartofseries Pediatric exercise science
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher.
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm
dc.subject Humans
dc.subject Exercise
dc.subject Feasibility Studies
dc.subject Physical Education and Training
dc.subject Schools
dc.subject School Health Services
dc.subject High-Intensity Interval Training
dc.subject curriculum
dc.subject Clinical Research
dc.subject Pediatric
dc.subject Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities
dc.subject Prevention
dc.subject 6.7 Physical
dc.subject 6 Evaluation of treatments and therapeutic interventions
dc.subject 4 Quality Education
dc.subject Science & Technology
dc.subject Life Sciences & Biomedicine
dc.subject Pediatrics
dc.subject Physiology
dc.subject Sport Sciences
dc.subject Keywords
dc.subject MENTAL-HEALTH
dc.subject ACTIVITY INTERVENTIONS
dc.subject FITNESS
dc.subject CHILD
dc.subject QUESTIONNAIRE
dc.subject ADOLESCENTS
dc.subject STRENGTHS
dc.subject TEACHERS
dc.subject VALIDITY
dc.subject 1106 Human Movement and Sports Sciences
dc.subject 1114 Paediatrics and Reproductive Medicine
dc.subject 1302 Curriculum and Pedagogy
dc.title Feasibility and Provisional Efficacy of Embedding High-Intensity Interval Training Into Physical Education Lessons: A Pilot Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial.
dc.type Journal Article
dc.identifier.doi 10.1123/pes.2020-0255
pubs.issue 4
pubs.begin-page 186
pubs.volume 33
dc.date.updated 2023-04-01T04:25:17Z
dc.rights.holder Copyright: The authors en
dc.identifier.pmid 34348226 (pubmed)
pubs.author-url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34348226
pubs.end-page 195
pubs.publication-status Published
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/RetrictedAccess en
pubs.subtype Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
pubs.subtype Randomized Controlled Trial
pubs.subtype Journal Article
pubs.elements-id 861772
pubs.org-id Medical and Health Sciences
pubs.org-id Science
pubs.org-id Statistics
pubs.org-id School of Medicine
pubs.org-id Surgery Department
dc.identifier.eissn 1543-2920
dc.identifier.pii pes.2020-0255
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2023-04-01
pubs.online-publication-date 2021-08-04


Files in this item

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics