Protein supplementation of human milk for promoting growth in preterm infants.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Amissah, Emma A
dc.contributor.author Brown, Julie
dc.contributor.author Harding, Jane E
dc.coverage.spatial England
dc.date.accessioned 2023-06-12T02:24:01Z
dc.date.available 2023-06-12T02:24:01Z
dc.date.issued 2018-06-22
dc.identifier.citation (2018). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 6(6), CD000433-.
dc.identifier.issn 1361-6137
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/2292/64162
dc.description.abstract BACKGROUND: Preterm infants require high protein intake to achieve adequate growth and development. Although breast milk feeding has many benefits for this population, the protein content is highly variable, and inadequate to support rapid infant growth. This is a 2018 update of a Cochrane Review first published in 1999. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether protein-supplemented human milk compared with unsupplemented human milk, fed to preterm infants, improves growth, body composition, cardio-metabolic, and neurodevelopmental outcomes, without significant adverse effects. SEARCH METHODS: We used the standard search strategy of Cochrane Neonatal to search CENTRAL, MEDLINE via PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL (February 2018). We also searched clinical trials databases, conference proceedings and the reference lists of retrieved articles for randomised controlled trials (RCT) and quasi-randomised trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: Published and unpublished RCTs were eligible if they used random or quasi-random methods to allocate hospitalised preterm infants who were being fed human milk, to additional protein supplementation or no supplementation. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently abstracted data, assessed risk of bias and the quality of evidence at the outcome level, using GRADE methodology. We performed meta-analyses, using risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous data, and mean difference (MD) for continuous data, with their respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We used a fixed-effect model and had planned to explore potential causes of heterogeneity via subgroup or sensitivity analyses. MAIN RESULTS: We included six RCTs, involving 204 preterm infants. Low-quality evidence showed that protein supplementation of human milk increased in-hospital rates of growth in weight (MD 3.82 g/kg/day, 95% CI 2.94 to 4.7; five RCTs, 101 infants; I² = 73%), length (MD 0.12 cm/wk, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.17; four RCTs, 68 infants; I² = 89%), and head circumference (MD 0.06 cm/wk, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.12; four RCTs, 68 infants; I² = 84%). There was no evidence of a clear difference in rate of growth of skin fold thickness between the supplemented and unsupplemented groups (triceps MD 0.06 mm/wk, 95% CI -0.09 to 0.21; one RCT, 20 infants; or subscapular MD 0.00 mm/wk, 95% CI -0.17 to 0.17; one RCT, 20 infants). Protein supplementation led to longer hospital stays (MD 18.5 days, 95% CI 4.39 to 32.61; one RCT, 20 infants; very low-quality evidence), and higher blood urea nitrogen concentrations compared to the unsupplemented group (MD 0.95 mmol/L, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.09; four RCTs, 81 infants; I² = 56%). Very low-quality evidence did not show that protein supplementation clearly increased the risk of feeding intolerance (RR 2.70, 95% CI 0.13 to 58.24; one RCT, 17 infants), or necrotizing enterocolitis (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.07 to 17.12; one RCT, 76 infants), or clearly altered serum albumin concentrations (MD 2.5 g/L, 95% CI -5.66 to 10.66; one RCT, 11 infants), compared with the unsupplemented groups. No data were available about the effects of protein supplementation on long-term growth, body mass index, body composition, neurodevelopmental, or cardio-metabolic outcomes. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Low-quality evidence showed that protein supplementation of human milk, fed to preterm infants, increased short-term growth. However, the small sample sizes, low precision, and very low-quality evidence regarding duration of hospital stay, feeding intolerance, and necrotising enterocolitis precluded any conclusions about these outcomes. There were no data on outcomes after hospital discharge. Our findings may not be generalisable to low-resource settings, as none of the included studies were conducted in these settings.Since protein supplementation of human milk is now usually done as a component of multi-nutrient fortifiers, future studies should compare different amounts of protein in multi-component fortifiers, and be designed to determine the effects on duration of hospital stay and safety, as well as on long-term growth, body composition, cardio-metabolic, and neurodevelopmental outcomes.
dc.language eng
dc.publisher Wiley
dc.relation.ispartofseries Cochrane Database Syst Rev
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher.
dc.rights This review is published as a Cochrane Review in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2018, 6. Cochrane Reviews are regularly updated as new evidence emerges and in response to comments and criticisms, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews should be consulted for the most recent version of the Review.
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm
dc.rights.uri https://documentation.cochrane.org/display/EPPR/Standard+%7C+Cochrane+Review
dc.subject Dietary Proteins
dc.subject Dietary Supplements
dc.subject Humans
dc.subject Infant Nutritional Physiological Phenomena
dc.subject Infant, Newborn
dc.subject Infant, Premature
dc.subject Milk, Human
dc.subject Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
dc.subject Preterm, Low Birth Weight and Health of the Newborn
dc.subject Pediatric
dc.subject Nutrition
dc.subject Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities
dc.subject Prevention
dc.subject Comparative Effectiveness Research
dc.subject Perinatal Period - Conditions Originating in Perinatal Period
dc.subject Infant Mortality
dc.subject Clinical Research
dc.subject Reproductive health and childbirth
dc.subject 3 Good Health and Well Being
dc.subject Science & Technology
dc.subject Life Sciences & Biomedicine
dc.subject Medicine, General & Internal
dc.subject General & Internal Medicine
dc.subject *Dietary Supplements
dc.subject *Infant Nutritional Physiological Phenomena
dc.subject *Milk
dc.subject Human
dc.subject Growth
dc.subject Infant
dc.subject Premature
dc.subject Newborn
dc.subject LOW-BIRTH-WEIGHT
dc.subject PREMATURE-INFANTS
dc.subject NECROTIZING ENTEROCOLITIS
dc.subject BONE MINERALIZATION
dc.subject HEAD CIRCUMFERENCE
dc.subject NUTRITIONAL NEEDS
dc.subject POSTNATAL-GROWTH
dc.subject RANDOMIZED-TRIAL
dc.subject FORTIFICATION
dc.subject DIET
dc.subject 11 Medical and Health Sciences
dc.subject 17 Psychology and Cognitive Sciences
dc.title Protein supplementation of human milk for promoting growth in preterm infants.
dc.type Journal Article
dc.identifier.doi 10.1002/14651858.CD000433.pub2
pubs.issue 6
pubs.begin-page CD000433
pubs.volume 6
dc.date.updated 2023-05-10T00:20:41Z
dc.rights.holder Copyright: The Cochrane Collaboration en
pubs.author-url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29931679
pubs.publication-status Published online
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/OpenAccess en
pubs.subtype Journal Article
pubs.subtype Meta-Analysis
pubs.subtype Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
pubs.subtype Review
pubs.subtype Systematic Review
pubs.elements-id 474859
pubs.org-id Liggins Institute
pubs.org-id LiFePATH
dc.identifier.eissn 1469-493X
pubs.number ARTN CD000433
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2023-05-10
pubs.online-publication-date 2018-06-22


Files in this item

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics