Indications for red blood cell transfusion in cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Patel, Nishith N
dc.contributor.author Avlonitis, Vassilios S
dc.contributor.author Jones, Hayley E
dc.contributor.author Reeves, Barnaby C
dc.contributor.author Sterne, Jonathan AC
dc.contributor.author Murphy, Gavin J
dc.coverage.spatial England
dc.date.accessioned 2023-12-05T00:20:59Z
dc.date.available 2023-12-05T00:20:59Z
dc.date.issued 2015-12
dc.identifier.citation (2015). The Lancet Haematology, 2(12), e543-e553.
dc.identifier.issn 2352-3026
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/2292/66698
dc.description.abstract <h4>Background</h4>Good blood management is an important determinant of outcome in cardiac surgery. Guidelines recommend restrictive red blood cell transfusion. Our objective was to systematically review the evidence from randomised controlled trials and observational studies that are used to inform transfusion decisions in adult cardiac surgery.<h4>Methods</h4>We did a systematic review by searching PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and DARE, from inception to May 1, 2015, databases from specialist societies, and bibliographies of included studies and recent relevant review articles. We included randomised controlled trials that assessed the effect of liberal versus restrictive red blood cell transfusion in patients undergoing cardiac and non-cardiac surgery, and observational studies that assessed the effect of red blood cell transfusion compared with no transfusion on outcomes in adult cardiac patients after surgery. We pooled adjusted odds ratios using fixed-effects and random-effects meta-analyses. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality.<h4>Findings</h4>We included data from six cardiac surgical randomised controlled trials (3352 patients), 19 non-cardiac surgical trials (8361 patients), and 39 observational studies (232,806 patients). The pooled fixed effects mortality odds ratios comparing liberal versus restrictive transfusion thresholds was 0.70 (95% CI 0.49-1.02; p=0.060) for cardiac surgical trials and 1.10 (95% CI 0.96-1.27; p=0.16) for trials in settings other than cardiac surgery. By contrast, observational cohort studies in cardiac surgery showed that red blood cell transfusion compared with no transfusion was associated with substantially higher mortality (random effects odds ratio 2.72, 95% CI 2.11-3.49; p<0.0001) and other morbidity, although with substantial heterogeneity and small study effects.<h4>Interpretation</h4>Evidence from randomised controlled trials in cardiac surgery refutes findings from observational studies that liberal thresholds for red blood cell transfusion are associated with a substantially increased risk of mortality and morbidity. Observational studies and trials in non-cardiac surgery should not be used to inform treatment decisions or guidelines for patients having cardiac surgery.<h4>Funding</h4>None.
dc.format.medium Print-Electronic
dc.language eng
dc.publisher Elsevier
dc.relation.ispartofseries The Lancet. Haematology
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher.
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm
dc.subject Erythrocytes
dc.subject Humans
dc.subject Blood Loss, Surgical
dc.subject Treatment Outcome
dc.subject Erythrocyte Transfusion
dc.subject Blood Transfusion, Autologous
dc.subject Cardiac Surgical Procedures
dc.subject Odds Ratio
dc.subject 32 Biomedical and Clinical Sciences
dc.subject 3201 Cardiovascular Medicine and Haematology
dc.subject 3202 Clinical Sciences
dc.subject Heart Disease
dc.subject Clinical Research
dc.subject Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities
dc.subject Cardiovascular
dc.subject 6 Evaluation of treatments and therapeutic interventions
dc.subject 6.4 Surgery
dc.subject 3 Good Health and Well Being
dc.subject Science & Technology
dc.subject Life Sciences & Biomedicine
dc.subject Hematology
dc.subject LONG-TERM SURVIVAL
dc.subject SURGICAL-SITE INFECTIONS
dc.subject CRITICALLY-ILL PATIENTS
dc.subject BYPASS GRAFT-SURGERY
dc.subject ACUTE-RENAL-FAILURE
dc.subject RESTRICTIVE TRANSFUSION
dc.subject RISK-FACTORS
dc.subject RANDOMIZED-TRIAL
dc.subject CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS
dc.subject HEMOGLOBIN THRESHOLD
dc.subject 1102 Cardiorespiratory Medicine and Haematology
dc.subject 1103 Clinical Sciences
dc.title Indications for red blood cell transfusion in cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
dc.type Journal Article
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/s2352-3026(15)00198-2
pubs.issue 12
pubs.begin-page e543
pubs.volume 2
dc.date.updated 2023-11-04T08:44:17Z
dc.rights.holder Copyright: The authors en
dc.identifier.pmid 26686409 (pubmed)
pubs.author-url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26686409
pubs.end-page e553
pubs.publication-status Published
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/RetrictedAccess en
pubs.subtype Meta-Analysis
pubs.subtype Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
pubs.subtype Systematic Review
pubs.subtype Review
pubs.subtype Journal Article
pubs.elements-id 991342
pubs.org-id Medical and Health Sciences
pubs.org-id School of Medicine
pubs.org-id Surgery Department
dc.identifier.eissn 2352-3026
dc.identifier.pii S2352-3026(15)00198-2
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2023-11-04
pubs.online-publication-date 2015-11-17


Files in this item

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics