Fungal communities are differentially affected by conventional and biodynamic agricultural management approaches in vineyard ecosystems

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Morrison-Whittle, Peter
dc.contributor.author Lee, Soon A
dc.contributor.author Goddard, Matthew R
dc.date.accessioned 2024-03-10T22:48:18Z
dc.date.available 2024-03-10T22:48:18Z
dc.date.issued 2017-08
dc.identifier.citation (2017). Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 246, 306-313.
dc.identifier.issn 0167-8809
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/2292/67582
dc.description.abstract There is increased need to identify sustainable agricultural methods which avoid environmental degradation. Previous studies have focused on the effect of specific agricultural interventions on large organisms, but we have fewer data evaluating how microbes, which are key components of ecosystems, might be affected. Additionally, previous studies have been constrained as they only examined one habitat in an ecosystem and have not gone on to evaluate the effect of agricultural approach on harvested crops. Here we take an ecosystems approach and evaluate the net effect of conventional versus biodynamic management on agricultural ecosystems by quantifying fungal communities in multiple habitats using metagenomics. We go on to measure biodiversity in the crop and key chemical quality parameters in the product consumed by humans. We find that the method of management significantly affects communities in soil, on plant structures, and on the developing crop in subtle but importantly different ways in terms of number, type, and abundance of species. However, management approach has no effect on communities in the final harvested juice, nor on product traits aligned with quality. This shows that while management approach impacts different habitats in the environment in different ways, this does not automatically flow onto the harvested crop.
dc.language en
dc.publisher Elsevier
dc.relation.ispartofseries Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher.
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject 30 Agricultural, Veterinary and Food Sciences
dc.subject 41 Environmental Sciences
dc.subject 44 Human Society
dc.subject 2 Zero Hunger
dc.subject Science & Technology
dc.subject Life Sciences & Biomedicine
dc.subject Agriculture, Multidisciplinary
dc.subject Ecology
dc.subject Environmental Sciences
dc.subject Agriculture
dc.subject Environmental Sciences & Ecology
dc.subject Agricultural microbiology
dc.subject Community ecology
dc.subject Vineyard fungi
dc.subject SOIL MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES
dc.subject BACTERIAL COMMUNITIES
dc.subject SAUVIGNON BLANC
dc.subject GRAPE BERRIES
dc.subject ASSEMBLY PROCESSES
dc.subject RIPENING PROCESS
dc.subject VOLATILE THIOLS
dc.subject FARMING SYSTEM
dc.subject YEAST
dc.subject RESILIENCE
dc.subject 05 Environmental Sciences
dc.subject 07 Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences
dc.subject 16 Studies in Human Society
dc.title Fungal communities are differentially affected by conventional and biodynamic agricultural management approaches in vineyard ecosystems
dc.type Journal Article
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.agee.2017.05.022
pubs.begin-page 306
pubs.volume 246
dc.date.updated 2024-02-14T01:08:36Z
dc.rights.holder Copyright: The authors en
pubs.author-url https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880917302219?via%3Dihub
pubs.end-page 313
pubs.publication-status Published
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/OpenAccess en
pubs.subtype Article
pubs.subtype Journal
pubs.elements-id 646687
pubs.org-id Science
pubs.org-id Biological Sciences
dc.identifier.eissn 1873-2305
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2024-02-14


Files in this item

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics