Abstract:
Background: The aetiology of functional constipation (FC) is poorly understood; however, it is
believed that an individual's genetics, environment, and lifestyle behaviours all contribute to FC
manifestation. Hence, populations originating from different geographical regions likely
experience different drivers of FC, including diet, yet drivers in Asian compared to Caucasian
populations are under-researched. This study aimed to investigate whether the diets of Chinese with
FC (Ch-FC) differ from non-Chinese with FC (NCh-FC), alongside Chinese and non-Chinese
healthy controls (Ch-CON and NCh-CON respectively).
Methods: A cross-sectional observational case-control study with a longitudinal subgroup was
conducted to investigate dietary differences in Ch-FC (n = 11) compared to controls (NCh-FC, n =
16; Ch-CON, n = 19; NCh-CON, n = 20). Three-day food diaries (3-DFDs) and a food frequency
questionnaire (FFQ) were used to collect short-term and habitual nutrient intakes, respectively. The
time-dependency of nutrient intakes was assessed using 3-DFDs at three additional time points
over three months in a subgroup of the participants (n = 47). The FFQ also measured food intake,
used to identify dietary patterns (DPs) with principal component analysis. Dietary intake and
adherence to DPs were compared across cases and controls.
Results: Dietary intake of individuals with FC did not differ by ethnicity (ethnicity x FC status
interaction p>0.05). Although differences in habitual nutrient intake were not identified, the 3-DFD
found that individuals with FC consistently consumed less fibre and several micronutrients,
including magnesium, compared to healthy controls (FC status effect p<0.05). Chinese individuals
consistently consumed more cholesterol and less alcohol compared to non-Chinese (ethnicity effect
p<0.05). The intake of several nutrients depended on assessment time point. Those with FC
consumed 5.5 fewer servings/week of fruit than healthy controls (FC status effect p<0.05), while
Chinese individuals consumed 1.1 fewer servings/week of fast food than non-Chinese (ethnicity
effect p<0.05). Three DPs were identified: Discretionary (positive loadings for fast food,
sugar/sweets/baked goods, processed meat, alcohol), Guideline (positive loadings for meat,
starches, vegetables, wholegrains), and ‘Mixed’ (positive loadings for processed meat, oils/spreads,
fruit, vegetables, coffee/tea). DP adherence did not differ by ethnicity or FC status (p>0.05).
Conclusions: Diet did not differ between Ch-FC and NCh-FC, suggesting environmental
influences may have had a larger impact on diet compared to ethnicity. Fibre, magnesium, and fruit
may be plausible dietary targets for FC. Alternative and more targeted definitions of dietary intake,
such as investigating specific foods and defining food groups more narrowly, are required to further
understand ethnic differences in the diets of Chinese and non-Chinese individuals with FC.