Evaluation of a quality improvement intervention to reduce anastomotic leak following right colectomy (EAGLE): pragmatic, batched stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized trial in 64 countries

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author ESCP EAGLE Safe Anastomosis Collaborative
dc.contributor.author NIHR Global Health Research Unit in Surgery
dc.coverage.spatial England
dc.date.accessioned 2024-07-11T01:02:13Z
dc.date.available 2024-07-11T01:02:13Z
dc.date.issued 2024-01
dc.identifier.citation (2024). British Journal of Surgery, 111(1), znad370.
dc.identifier.issn 0007-1323
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/2292/69126
dc.description.abstract Background: Anastomotic leak affects 8 per cent of patients after right colectomy with a 10-fold increased risk of postoperative death. The EAGLE study aimed to develop and test whether an international, standardized quality improvement intervention could reduce anastomotic leaks. Methods: The internationally intended protocol, iteratively co-developed by a multistage Delphi process, comprised an online educational module introducing risk stratification, an intraoperative checklist, and harmonized surgical techniques. Clusters (hospital teams) were randomized to one of three arms with varied sequences of intervention/data collection by a derived stepped- wedge batch design (at least 18 hospital teams per batch). Patients were blinded to the study allocation. Low- and middle-income country enrolment was encouraged. The primary outcome (assessed by intention to treat) was anastomotic leak rate, and subgroup analyses by module completion (at least 80 per cent of surgeons, high engagement; less than 50 per cent, low engagement) were preplanned. Results: A total 355 hospital teams registered, with 332 from 64 countries (39.2 per cent low and middle income) included in the final analysis. The online modules were completed by half of the surgeons (2143 of 4411). The primary analysis included 3039 of the 3268 patients recruited (206 patients had no anastomosis and 23 were lost to follow-up), with anastomotic leaks arising before and after the intervention in 10.1 and 9.6 per cent respectively (adjusted OR 0.87, 95 per cent c.i. 0.59 to 1.30; P = 0.498). The proportion of surgeons completing the educational modules was an influence: the leak rate decreased from 12.2 per cent (61 of 500) before intervention to 5.1 per cent (24 of 473) after intervention in high-engagement centres (adjusted OR 0.36, 0.20 to 0.64; P < 0.001), but this was not observed in low-engagement hospitals (8.3 per cent (59 of 714) and 13.8 per cent (61 of 443) respectively; adjusted OR 2.09, 1.31 to 3.31). Conclusion: Completion of globally available digital training by engaged teams can alter anastomotic leak rates. Registration number: NCT04270721 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).
dc.format.medium Print
dc.language eng
dc.publisher Oxford University Press (OUP)
dc.relation.ispartofseries The British journal of surgery
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher.
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm
dc.rights.uri (https://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subject ESCP EAGLE Safe Anastomosis Collaborative and NIHR Global Health Research Unit in Surgery
dc.subject Humans
dc.subject Anastomosis, Surgical
dc.subject Colectomy
dc.subject Anastomotic Leak
dc.subject Quality Improvement
dc.subject 32 Biomedical and Clinical Sciences
dc.subject 3202 Clinical Sciences
dc.subject Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities
dc.subject Clinical Research
dc.subject Science & Technology
dc.subject Life Sciences & Biomedicine
dc.subject Surgery
dc.subject CLINICAL-TRIALS
dc.subject 11 Medical and Health Sciences
dc.title Evaluation of a quality improvement intervention to reduce anastomotic leak following right colectomy (EAGLE): pragmatic, batched stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized trial in 64 countries
dc.type Journal Article
dc.identifier.doi 10.1093/bjs/znad370
pubs.issue 1
pubs.begin-page znad370
pubs.volume 111
dc.date.updated 2024-06-08T00:29:11Z
dc.rights.holder Copyright: The authors en
dc.identifier.pmid 38029386 (pubmed)
pubs.author-url https://academic.oup.com/bjs/article/111/1/znad370/7455707
pubs.publication-status Published
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/OpenAccess en
pubs.subtype research-article
pubs.subtype Randomized Controlled Trial
pubs.subtype Journal Article
pubs.elements-id 1010946
pubs.org-id Medical and Health Sciences
pubs.org-id School of Medicine
pubs.org-id Surgery Department
dc.identifier.eissn 1365-2168
dc.identifier.pii 7455707
pubs.number ARTN znad370
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2024-06-08
pubs.online-publication-date 2023-11-29


Files in this item

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics