Do Sideline Tests of Vestibular and Oculomotor Function Accurately Diagnose Sports-Related Concussion in Adults? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Harris, Sarah A
dc.contributor.author Dempsey, Alasdair R
dc.contributor.author Mackie, Katherine
dc.contributor.author King, Doug
dc.contributor.author Hecimovich, Mark
dc.contributor.author Murphy, Myles C
dc.coverage.spatial United States
dc.date.accessioned 2024-07-11T03:36:03Z
dc.date.available 2024-07-11T03:36:03Z
dc.date.issued 2022-07
dc.identifier.citation (2022). American Journal of Sports Medicine, 50(9), 2542-2551.
dc.identifier.issn 0363-5465
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/2292/69150
dc.description.abstract <h4>Background</h4>Sports-related concussion (SRC) assessment tools are primarily based on subjective assessments of somatic, cognitive, and psychosocial/emotional symptoms. SRC symptoms remain underreported, and objective measures of SRC impairments would be valuable to assist diagnosis. Measurable impairments to vestibular and oculomotor processing have been shown to occur after SRC and may provide valid objective assessments.<h4>Purpose</h4>Determine the diagnostic accuracy of sideline tests of vestibular and oculomotor dysfunction to identify SRC in adults.<h4>Study design</h4>Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.<h4>Methods</h4>Electronic databases and gray literature were searched from inception until February 12, 2020. Physically active individuals (>16 years of age) who participated in sports were included. The reference standard for SRC was a combination of clinical signs and symptoms (eg, the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool [SCAT]), and index tests included any oculomotor assessment tool. The QUADAS tool was used to assess risk of bias, with the credibility of the evidence being rated according to GRADE.<h4>Results</h4>A total of 8 studies were included in this review. All included studies used the King-Devick test, with no other measures being identified. Meta-analysis was performed on 4 studies with a summary sensitivity and specificity of 0.77 and 0.82, respectively. The overall credibility of the evidence was rated as very low.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Caution must be taken when interpreting these results given the very low credibility of the evidence, and the true summary sensitivity and specificity may substantially differ from the values calculated within this systematic review. Therefore, we recommend that clinicians using the King-Devick test to diagnose SRC in adults do so in conjunction with other tools such as the SCAT.<h4>Prospero registration</h4>CRD42018106632.
dc.format.medium Print-Electronic
dc.language eng
dc.publisher SAGE Publications
dc.relation.ispartofseries The American journal of sports medicine
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher.
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm
dc.subject Humans
dc.subject Brain Concussion
dc.subject Athletic Injuries
dc.subject Sensitivity and Specificity
dc.subject Sports Medicine
dc.subject Sports
dc.subject King-Devick
dc.subject SCAT
dc.subject SRC
dc.subject VOMS
dc.subject concussion
dc.subject diagnosis
dc.subject 4201 Allied Health and Rehabilitation Science
dc.subject 32 Biomedical and Clinical Sciences
dc.subject 3202 Clinical Sciences
dc.subject 42 Health Sciences
dc.subject Clinical Research
dc.subject Brain Disorders
dc.subject Health Disparities
dc.subject Neurosciences
dc.subject 4 Detection, screening and diagnosis
dc.subject 4.2 Evaluation of markers and technologies
dc.subject Science & Technology
dc.subject Life Sciences & Biomedicine
dc.subject Orthopedics
dc.subject Sport Sciences
dc.subject KING-DEVICK TEST
dc.subject VISUAL SCREENING TOOL
dc.subject EYE-MOVEMENTS
dc.subject RUGBY LEAGUE
dc.subject RECOMMENDATIONS
dc.subject EPIDEMIOLOGY
dc.subject UNION
dc.subject 0903 Biomedical Engineering
dc.subject 0913 Mechanical Engineering
dc.subject 1106 Human Movement and Sports Sciences
dc.subject 4207 Sports science and exercise
dc.title Do Sideline Tests of Vestibular and Oculomotor Function Accurately Diagnose Sports-Related Concussion in Adults? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
dc.type Journal Article
dc.identifier.doi 10.1177/03635465211027946
pubs.issue 9
pubs.begin-page 2542
pubs.volume 50
dc.date.updated 2024-06-30T12:41:35Z
dc.rights.holder Copyright: American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine en
dc.identifier.pmid 34432554 (pubmed)
pubs.author-url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34432554
pubs.end-page 2551
pubs.publication-status Published
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/RetrictedAccess en
pubs.subtype Meta-Analysis
pubs.subtype Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
pubs.subtype Systematic Review
pubs.subtype Journal Article
pubs.elements-id 1034273
pubs.org-id Bioengineering Institute
dc.identifier.eissn 1552-3365
pubs.number ARTN 03635465211027946
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2024-07-01
pubs.online-publication-date 2021-08-25


Files in this item

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics