Did steam boost the height and growth rate of the giant Hunga eruption plume?

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Mastin, Larry G
dc.contributor.author Van Eaton, Alexa R
dc.contributor.author Cronin, Shane J
dc.date.accessioned 2024-07-11T23:33:10Z
dc.date.available 2024-07-11T23:33:10Z
dc.identifier.citation (n.d.). Bulletin of Volcanology, 86(7), Article 64.
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/2292/69190
dc.description.abstract <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>The eruption of Hunga volcano on 15 January 2022 produced a higher plume and faster-growing umbrella cloud than has ever been previously recorded. The plume height exceeded 58 km, and the umbrella grew to 450 km in diameter within 50 min. Assuming an umbrella thickness of 10 km, this growth rate implied an average volume injection rate into the umbrella of 330–500 km<jats:sup>3</jats:sup> s<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>. Conventional relationships between plume height, umbrella-growth rate, and mass eruption rate suggest that this period of activity should have injected a few to several cubic kilometers of rock particles (tephra) into the plume. Yet tephra fall deposits on neighboring islands are only a few centimeters thick and can be reproduced using ash transport simulations with only 0.1–0.2 km<jats:sup>3</jats:sup> erupted volume (dense-rock equivalent). How could such a powerful eruption contain so little tephra? Here, we propose that seawater mixing at the vent boosted the plume height and umbrella growth rate. Using the one-dimensional (1-D) steady plume model Plumeria, we find that a plume fed by ~90% water vapor at a temperature of 100 °C (referred to here as steam) could have exceeded 50 km height while keeping the injection rate of solids low enough to be consistent with Hunga’s modest tephra-fall deposit volume. Steam is envisaged to rise from intense phreatomagmatic jets or pyroclastic density currents entering the ocean. Overall, the height and expansion rate of Hunga’s giant plume is consistent with the total mass of fall deposits plus underwater density current deposits, even though most of the erupted mass decoupled from the high plume. This example represents a class of high (&gt; 10 km), ash-poor, steam-driven plumes, that also includes Kīlauea (2020) and Fukutoku-oka-no-ba (2021). Their height is driven by heat flux following well-established relations; however, most of the heat is contained in steam rather than particles. As a result, the heights of these water-rich plumes do not follow well-known relations with the mass eruption rate of tephra.</jats:p>
dc.language en
dc.publisher Springer Science and Business Media LLC
dc.relation.ispartofseries Bulletin of Volcanology
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher.
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject 0403 Geology
dc.subject 3703 Geochemistry
dc.subject 3705 Geology
dc.title Did steam boost the height and growth rate of the giant Hunga eruption plume?
dc.type Journal Article
dc.identifier.doi 10.1007/s00445-024-01749-1
pubs.issue 7
pubs.volume 86
dc.date.updated 2024-06-18T18:01:39Z
dc.rights.holder Copyright: The authors en
pubs.publication-status Published online
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/OpenAccess en
pubs.elements-id 1033343
pubs.org-id Science
pubs.org-id School of Environment
dc.identifier.eissn 1432-0819
pubs.number 64
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2024-06-19
pubs.online-publication-date 2024-06-17


Files in this item

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics