An investigation into discharge, visual perception, and appearance concerns of prosthetic eye wearers.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Pine, Nicola S
dc.contributor.author de Terte, Ian
dc.contributor.author Pine, Keith R
dc.coverage.spatial England
dc.date.accessioned 2024-07-12T00:17:23Z
dc.date.available 2024-07-12T00:17:23Z
dc.date.issued 2017-12
dc.identifier.citation (2017). Orbit, 36(6), 401-406.
dc.identifier.issn 0167-6830
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/2292/69199
dc.description.abstract We investigate prosthetic eye wearers' initial and current concerns about mucoid discharge, visual perception, and appearance, and the reasons for their concerns. A retrospective, cross-sectional study of private practice patients was designed. Participants were 217 experienced prosthetic eye wearers, aged at least 16 years. An anonymous questionnaire was e-mailed or mailed to participants. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to investigate differences or correlations between variables. Content analysis was used to analyze participants' open responses. Participants were equally concerned about discharge, visual perception, and appearance during the first three months following eye loss and at least 2 years later, even though their concerns decreased. Older participants were less concerned about appearance, while females were more concerned about current discharge and appearance. The greater the frequency and volume of discharge, the greater was the concern. Participants' initial discharge concern was due to a negative interpretation of what it meant, but later, it was due to discomfort from wiping, and how discharge looked to others. Loss of depth perception and reduced visual range were equally concerning. Initial appearance concerns related to disguisability of the prosthesis, but over time, changes to the socket and eyelids became more important. Loss of self-image is commonly considered to be the major concern of anophthalmic patients, but discharge and visual perception concerns are of equal importance. Reasons given for these concerns provide greater insight into patients' personal experience of eye loss.
dc.format.medium Print-Electronic
dc.language eng
dc.publisher Taylor & Francis
dc.relation.ispartofseries Orbit (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher.
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm
dc.subject Orbit
dc.subject Mucus
dc.subject Body Fluids
dc.subject Humans
dc.subject Retrospective Studies
dc.subject Cross-Sectional Studies
dc.subject Eye, Artificial
dc.subject Body Image
dc.subject Visual Perception
dc.subject Quality of Life
dc.subject Middle Aged
dc.subject Patients
dc.subject Female
dc.subject Male
dc.subject Surveys and Questionnaires
dc.subject Concerns
dc.subject ocular prosthesis
dc.subject prosthetic eye wearers
dc.subject psychological impact
dc.subject 32 Biomedical and Clinical Sciences
dc.subject 3203 Dentistry
dc.subject 3212 Ophthalmology and Optometry
dc.subject Clinical Research
dc.subject Eye Disease and Disorders of Vision
dc.subject Eye
dc.subject 1103 Clinical Sciences
dc.title An investigation into discharge, visual perception, and appearance concerns of prosthetic eye wearers.
dc.type Journal Article
dc.identifier.doi 10.1080/01676830.2017.1337201
pubs.issue 6
pubs.begin-page 401
pubs.volume 36
dc.date.updated 2024-06-03T05:55:21Z
dc.rights.holder Copyright: The authors en
dc.identifier.pmid 28812412 (pubmed)
pubs.author-url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28812412
pubs.end-page 406
pubs.publication-status Published
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/RetrictedAccess en
pubs.subtype Journal Article
pubs.elements-id 1029952
pubs.org-id Medical and Health Sciences
pubs.org-id Optometry and Vision Science
dc.identifier.eissn 1744-5108
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2024-06-03
pubs.online-publication-date 2017-08-16


Files in this item

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics