Attitudes and Reactions to a Healthcare Robot

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Broadbent, Elizabeth en
dc.contributor.author Kuo, I-Han en
dc.contributor.author Lee, YI en
dc.contributor.author Rabindran, J en
dc.contributor.author Kerse, Ngaire en
dc.contributor.author Stafford, R en
dc.contributor.author MacDonald, Bruce en
dc.date.accessioned 2011-11-13T20:38:18Z en
dc.date.issued 2010-06 en
dc.identifier.citation TELEMED J E-HEALTH 16(5):608-613 Jun 2010 en
dc.identifier.issn 1530-5627 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2292/8955 en
dc.description.abstract Objective: The use of robots in healthcare is a new concept. The public's perception and acceptance is not well understood. The objective was to investigate the perceptions and emotions toward the utilization of healthcare robots among individuals over 40 years of age, investigate factors contributing to acceptance, and evaluate differences in blood pressure checks taken by a robot and a medical student. Materials and Methods: Fifty-seven (n = 57) adults aged over 40 years and recruited from local general practitioner or gerontology group lists participated in two cross-sectional studies. The first was an open-ended questionnaire assessing perceptions of robots. In the second study, participants had their blood pressure taken by a medical student and by a robot. Patient comfort with each encounter, perceived accuracy of each measurement, and the quality of the patient interaction were studied in each case. Readings were compared by independent t-tests and regression analyses were conducted to predict quality ratings. Results: Participants' perceptions about robots were influenced by their prior exposure to robots in literature or entertainment media. Participants saw many benefits and applications for healthcare robots, including simple medical procedures and physical assistance, but had some concerns about reliability, safety, and the loss of personal care. Blood pressure readings did not differ between the medical student and robot, but participants felt more comfortable with the medical student and saw the robot as less accurate. Although age and sex were not significant predictors, individuals who held more positive initial attitudes and emotions toward robots rated the robot interaction more favorably. Conclusions: Many people see robots as having benefits and applications in healthcare but some have concerns. Individual attitudes and emotions regarding robots in general are likely to influence future acceptance of their introduction into healthcare processes. en
dc.language EN en
dc.publisher MARY ANN LIEBERT INC en
dc.relation.ispartofseries Telemedicine and e-Health en
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Details obtained from http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/issn/1530-5627/ en
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm en
dc.subject technology en
dc.subject e-health en
dc.subject home health monitoring en
dc.subject NEGATIVE AFFECT en
dc.subject TECHNOLOGY en
dc.subject REHABILITATION en
dc.subject POPULATION en
dc.subject PEOPLE en
dc.subject ELDERS en
dc.title Attitudes and Reactions to a Healthcare Robot en
dc.type Journal Article en
dc.identifier.doi 10.1089/tmj.2009.0171 en
pubs.issue 5 en
pubs.begin-page 608 en
pubs.volume 16 en
dc.rights.holder Copyright: MARY ANN LIEBERT INC en
dc.identifier.pmid 20575729 en
pubs.end-page 613 en
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/RestrictedAccess en
pubs.subtype Article en
pubs.elements-id 119726 en
pubs.org-id Engineering en
pubs.org-id Department of Electrical, Computer and Software Engineering en
pubs.org-id Medical and Health Sciences en
pubs.org-id Population Health en
pubs.org-id School of Medicine en
pubs.org-id Psychological Medicine Dept en
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2011-09-26 en
pubs.dimensions-id 20575729 en


Files in this item

There are no files associated with this item.

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics