Thermal energy storage in buildings using PCM: Computer simulation

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Khudhair, AM en
dc.contributor.author Farid, Mohammed en
dc.contributor.author Chen, JJJ en
dc.contributor.author Bansal, Pradeep en
dc.contributor.editor Goswami, D Yogi en
dc.contributor.editor Zhao, Yuwen en
dc.coverage.spatial Beijing, China en
dc.date.accessioned 2011-11-17T17:38:36Z en
dc.date.issued 2007 en
dc.identifier.citation ISES Solar World Congress (SWC2007), Beijing, China, 18 Sep 2007 - 21 Sep 2007. Editors: Goswami DY, Zhao Y. PROCEEDINGS OF ISES SOLAR WORLD CONGRESS 2007: SOLAR ENERGY AND HUMAN SETTLEMENT, VOLS I-V. 257-262. 2007 en
dc.identifier.isbn 978-3-540-75996-6 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2292/9322 en
dc.description.abstract This paper presents the results of phase changing material, RT20, impregnated up to 26%-wt into the gypsum wallboards to produce a significant thermal storage medium (PCMGW). A full-scale test facility using the PCMGW was monitored for two years, and was modeled using the thermal building simulation package, SUNREL, to evaluate the latent heat storage performance of the PCM treated wallboards. Measured and simulated results showed that the use of PCMGW met two needs: quick absorption of solar heat for use during off-sunshine hours and avoid overheating during sunshine hours. The PCMGWs effectively smoothed out diurnal daily fluctuations of indoor air temperatures on sunny days and, therefore, providing thermal comfort. Although the benefits of PCMGW were clearly demonstrated, it was necessary to optimize the melting point and quantity of the PCM and to highlight the importance of showing how many days the PCM could effectively minimize the indoor temperature fluctuation. In a 90-day period during summer, a PCM of with a melting range of 18 °C – 22 °C could be fully utilized for 39% and partially utilized for 55.5% of the summer days when there is either partial melting or partial freezing. There is no benefit for only 5.5% of the summer days when the PCM remains either in the solid or liquid state. These percentages show that the decision of using 26%-wt RT20 with the melting range of 18–22 °C is a practical and realistic one. en
dc.publisher Springer en
dc.relation.ispartof ISES Solar World Congress (SWC2007) en
dc.relation.ispartofseries PROCEEDINGS OF ISES SOLAR WORLD CONGRESS 2007: SOLAR ENERGY AND HUMAN SETTLEMENT, VOLS I-V en
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. en
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm en
dc.title Thermal energy storage in buildings using PCM: Computer simulation en
dc.type Conference Item en
dc.identifier.doi 10.1007/978-3-540-75997-3_42 en
pubs.begin-page 257 en
dc.rights.holder Copyright: Springer en
pubs.end-page 262 en
pubs.finish-date 2007-09-21 en
pubs.start-date 2007-09-18 en
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/RestrictedAccess en
pubs.subtype Proceedings en
pubs.elements-id 87752 en
pubs.org-id Engineering en
pubs.org-id Chemical and Materials Eng en
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2010-09-01 en


Files in this item

There are no files associated with this item.

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics