dc.contributor.author |
Sumpter, Paul |
en |
dc.date.accessioned |
2011-11-18T02:23:12Z |
en |
dc.date.issued |
2007 |
en |
dc.identifier.citation |
Australian Intellectual Property Journal 18(2):110-123 2007 |
en |
dc.identifier.issn |
1038-1635 |
en |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2292/9454 |
en |
dc.description.abstract |
Section 62A of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) – introduced by amendment in September 2006 – provides a ground of opposition to trade mark applications on the basis that it was “made in bad faith”. This article explores possible approaches to the new provision. |
en |
dc.publisher |
Thomson Reuters (Professional) |
en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries |
Australian Intellectual Property Journal |
en |
dc.rights |
Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Details obtained from http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/issn/1038-1635/ |
en |
dc.rights.uri |
https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm |
en |
dc.title |
section 62A: Pandora's box for trade mark practitioners? |
en |
dc.type |
Journal Article |
en |
pubs.issue |
2 |
en |
pubs.begin-page |
110 |
en |
pubs.volume |
18 |
en |
dc.rights.holder |
Copyright: Thomson Reuters; Lawbook Co. |
en |
pubs.author-url |
http://www.sclqld.org.au/lu/items/articles/7 |
en |
pubs.end-page |
123 |
en |
dc.rights.accessrights |
http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/RestrictedAccess |
en |
pubs.subtype |
Article |
en |
pubs.elements-id |
84745 |
en |
pubs.org-id |
Law |
en |
pubs.org-id |
Faculty Administration Law |
en |
pubs.record-created-at-source-date |
2010-09-01 |
en |