A national survey of the routine examination of the newborn baby

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Brown, Julie en
dc.contributor.author Dave, S en
dc.contributor.author Rogers, C en
dc.contributor.author Quist-Therson, E en
dc.contributor.author Townsend, J en
dc.date.accessioned 2011-11-29T20:20:09Z en
dc.date.issued 2003 en
dc.identifier.citation Midwifery 19(4):277-284 2003 en
dc.identifier.issn 0266-6138 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2292/9634 en
dc.description.abstract Objective: to identify current practices for the initial routine examination of healthy newborn babies, and determine the extent to which midwives are carrying out this examination. Design and participants: postal questionnaires were sent to consultant paediatricians and midwifery managers in all maternity units in England. Questionnaires were also sent to the 12 universities in England which run the N96 post-registration course in the examination of the newborn baby. Findings: questionnaires were returned from 197 (86%) maternity units. Senior house officers examined in 83% (160/193) a median of 92% of babies; 44% (74/167) had at least one midwife (median of two) with qualifications to carry out the examination and in 31% (51/167) some examinations were conducted by a midwife. However, a third of midwives with this qualification carried out no examinations, and nationally only about 2% of babies were examined by a midwife. Rates of referral by midwives and senior house officers were similar. Examinations were carried out between four and 48 hours from birth; most units considered six hours an acceptable minimum. An estimated 1% of babies were transferred home without routine examination; the GP was responsible for most (83–93%) of these babies’ examinations; midwives for 10–23%; and senior house officers in hospital for 4–7%. Twelve per cent (23/194) of units carried out a second examination prior to discharge. Most respondents were in favour of midwives carrying out the examinations provided they were adequately trained. Conclusions: Many of the consultant paediatricians and midwifery managers stated that suitably trained midwives could routinely examine the healthy newborn baby; however, many currently N96 trained midwives were examining few or no babies. An extension of training would be needed were midwife examination to become general policy. en
dc.publisher Elsevier Ltd. en
dc.relation.ispartofseries Midwifery en
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Details obtained from http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/issn/0266-6138/ en
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm en
dc.title A national survey of the routine examination of the newborn baby en
dc.type Journal Article en
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/S0266-6138(03)00044-5 en
pubs.issue 4 en
pubs.begin-page 277 en
pubs.volume 19 en
dc.rights.holder Copyright: Elsevier Ltd. en
dc.identifier.pmid 14623507 en
pubs.end-page 284 en
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/RestrictedAccess en
pubs.subtype Article en
pubs.elements-id 52971 en
pubs.org-id Medical and Health Sciences en
pubs.org-id School of Medicine en
pubs.org-id Obstetrics and Gynaecology en
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2010-09-01 en
pubs.dimensions-id 14623507 en


Files in this item

There are no files associated with this item.

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics