The Divergence of Country of Origin Labelling Regulations in Australia and New Zealand

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Tenbensel, T
dc.contributor.advisor Utter, J
dc.contributor.author Wood, Amanda en
dc.date.accessioned 2011-12-01T20:44:06Z en
dc.date.issued 2011 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2292/9675 en
dc.description.abstract Food labels can provide consumers with a range of information, from nutrition and health claims to indications of social and environmental health, such as fair trade practices or ethical animal treatment. Country of origin labels are one type of values-based label that represent broader public health issues such as environmental sustainability or the promotion of local food production. Knowing the country of origin of food allows consumers to make judgments about the production, transport, and health aspects of foods they purchase. Australia has mandatory country of origin labelling (CoOL) on many food products, while New Zealand has a voluntary scheme. Food standards are jointly regulated in Australia and New Zealand, and CoOL is one of few divergences in these trans-Tasman food regulations. From a policy perspective, this difference raises questions regarding which aspects of the policy process influenced these differing CoOL regulations. From a public health perspective, this raises questions of how public health researchers can effectively engage in and inform this policy process. Therefore, to contribute to the understanding of CoOL regulations by both public health and policy researchers, this research aimed to (1) describe the content and impact of past and current CoOL regulations in Australia and New Zealand (2) determine how to best explain the differing regulations and (3) discuss the implications for public health researchers. Interviews were conducted among key stakeholders in this policy issue, and relevant documents were analysed in order to address these objectives. The current findings revealed that an understanding of the policy networks in each country was imperative, but not sufficient for a comprehensive explanation of CoOL regulations. Public health researchers must also understand the role of interests, ideas, and institutions in the policy process. This will allow them to successfully engage in the policy process and to promote a frame of the issue in such a way that influences the decisions of policy makers. en
dc.publisher ResearchSpace@Auckland en
dc.relation.ispartof Masters Thesis - University of Auckland
dc.relation.isreferencedby UoA99222555514002091
dc.rights Restricted Item. Available to authenticated members of The University of Auckland. en
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. en
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm en
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/nz/ en
dc.title The Divergence of Country of Origin Labelling Regulations in Australia and New Zealand en
dc.type Thesis en
thesis.degree.discipline Public Health
thesis.degree.grantor The University of Auckland
thesis.degree.level Masters
dc.rights.holder Copyright: The author en
pubs.elements-id 249600 en
pubs.org-id Medical and Health Sciences en
pubs.org-id Population Health en
pubs.org-id Health Systems en
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2011-12-02 en


Files in this item

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics