O'Donnell, JPirret, AHoare, KMcDonald, E2025-04-032025-04-032023-10(2023). Annals of Emergency Medicine, 82(4), s21-s22.0196-0644https://hdl.handle.net/2292/71741Numerous studies have demonstrated the efficacy of nasal high-flow (NHF) therapy in many settings, including the emergency department (ED). Systematic reviews (SR) and meta-analyses (MA) of these studies have now emerged, particularly since the arrival of COVID-19. Accurately reported SRs and MAs can influence ED patient-centered outcomes. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist was developed in 2009 to guide SR reporting quality. This evaluation used the PRISMA checklist to assess the reporting quality of selected ED SRs.Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher.https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm32 Biomedical and Clinical Sciences3202 Clinical Sciences1103 Clinical SciencesAn Evaluation of the Reporting Quality of Emergency Department Systematic ReviewsConference Item10.1016/j.annemergmed.2023.08.073Copyright: The authors