Meyerhoff, Miriam2012-03-072009Language Variation and Change 21(3):297-317 20090954-3945https://hdl.handle.net/2292/13297Do the processes of replication, transfer, and calquing operate on speakers' mental organization of variables? Can the comparison of constraint rankings across languages provide evidence for (or against) the transfer of features in cases of long-term language contact? This article suggests yes to both questions. It undertakes a comparison of constraint rankings on null subjects and null objects in a corpus of Bislama and a corpus of Tamambo narratives to demonstrate the potential and limitations of such methods. It concludes that these methods: (i) allow us to particularize our definitions of replication, transfer, and calquing to inherently variable domains, and (ii) strengthen connections between variationist sociolinguistics and the fields of creolistics and language contact.Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Details obtained from http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/issn/0954-3945/https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htmGLOBALIZATIONDISCOURSEORIGINSReplication, transfer, and calquing: Using variation as a tool in the study of language contactJournal Article10.1017/S0954394509990196Copyright: Cambridge University Presshttp://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/RestrictedAccess