Andhov, MartaBaasch Andersen, CamillaHebbard, Tim2025-02-112025-02-112025-01-01(2025). The Public Procurement Law Review, (1), 47-72.0963-8245https://hdl.handle.net/2292/71268Public procurement plays a crucial role in driving economic activity and innovation, yet its complexity often creates barriers for stakeholders, particularly small and medium enterprises. This article explores how visual contracting—using diagrams, illustrations, and other graphic tools—could improve clarity and accessibility in public procurement processes. By offering a comparative analysis of systems in Denmark and Australia, the article examines the practical benefits of visual contracting, such as enhanced comprehension, reduced disputes, and improved communication between contracting parties. The discussion includes an evaluation of the legal and practical considerations, including enforceability, costs, and challenges of implementation. With examples and blueprints for applying visual contracting, this research provides a thoughtful exploration of its potential to complement existing procurement practices. The findings aim to inform policymakers, legal practitioners, and procurement officials about the opportunities for simplification and collaboration in public contracting. This article offers an engaging perspective on a novel approach to streamlining procurement processes, grounded in practical insights and comparative analysis.Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher.https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm1801 Law4803 International and comparative lawJournal ArticleCopyright: Thomson Reuters2754-2203