Law, J AdamDuggan, Laura VAsselin, MathieuBaker, PaulCrosby, EdwardDowney, AndrewHung, Orlando RJones, Philip MLemay, FrançoisNoppens, RudigerParotto, MatteoPreston, RoanneSowers, NickSparrow, KathrynTurkstra, Timothy PWong, David TKovacs, GeorgeCanadian Airway Focus Group2023-02-152023-02-152021-09(2021). Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia, 68(9), 1373-1404.0832-610Xhttps://hdl.handle.net/2292/62883<h4>Purpose</h4>Since the last Canadian Airway Focus Group (CAFG) guidelines were published in 2013, the literature on airway management has expanded substantially. The CAFG therefore re-convened to examine this literature and update practice recommendations. This first of two articles addresses difficulty encountered with airway management in an unconscious patient.<h4>Source</h4>Canadian Airway Focus Group members, including anesthesia, emergency medicine, and critical care physicians, were assigned topics to search. Searches were run in the Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and CINAHL databases. Results were presented to the group and discussed during video conferences every two weeks from April 2018 to July 2020. These CAFG recommendations are based on the best available published evidence. Where high-quality evidence was lacking, statements are based on group consensus.<h4>Findings and key recommendations</h4>Most studies comparing video laryngoscopy (VL) with direct laryngoscopy indicate a higher first attempt and overall success rate with VL, and lower complication rates. Thus, resources allowing, the CAFG now recommends use of VL with appropriately selected blade type to facilitate all tracheal intubations. If a first attempt at tracheal intubation or supraglottic airway (SGA) placement is unsuccessful, further attempts can be made as long as patient ventilation and oxygenation is maintained. Nevertheless, total attempts should be limited (to three or fewer) before declaring failure and pausing to consider "exit strategy" options. For failed intubation, exit strategy options in the still-oxygenated patient include awakening (if feasible), temporizing with an SGA, a single further attempt at tracheal intubation using a different technique, or front-of-neck airway access (FONA). Failure of tracheal intubation, face-mask ventilation, and SGA ventilation together with current or imminent hypoxemia defines a "cannot ventilate, cannot oxygenate" emergency. Neuromuscular blockade should be confirmed or established, and a single final attempt at face-mask ventilation, SGA placement, or tracheal intubation with hyper-angulated blade VL can be made, if it had not already been attempted. If ventilation remains impossible, emergency FONA should occur without delay using a scalpel-bougie-tube technique (in the adult patient). The CAFG recommends all institutions designate an individual as "airway lead" to help institute difficult airway protocols, ensure adequate training and equipment, and help with airway-related quality reviews.Print-ElectronicItems in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher.https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htmhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Canadian Airway Focus GroupHumansLaryngoscopyFocus GroupsIntubation, IntratrachealConsensusAdultCanadaAirway ManagementdifficultfailedguidelinesintubationtrachealClinical Trials and Supportive ActivitiesClinical ResearchScience & TechnologyLife Sciences & BiomedicineAnesthesiologyLARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAYSELF-INFLATING BULBASSOCIATION 2016 GUIDELINESFAILED TRACHEAL INTUBATIONMAC VIDEO LARYNGOSCOPEENDOTRACHEAL-TUBE PLACEMENTHOSPITAL CARDIAC-ARRESTINTENSIVE-CARE-UNITOBSTETRIC GENERAL-ANESTHESIAESOPHAGEAL DETECTOR DEVICE1103 Clinical SciencesCanadian Airway Focus Group updated consensus-based recommendations for management of the difficult airway: part 1. Difficult airway management encountered in an unconscious patient.Journal Article10.1007/s12630-021-02007-02023-01-26Copyright: The authors34143394 (pubmed)http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/OpenAccess1496-897510.1007/s12630-021-02007-0