Towards a global index of shared prosperity: a case study on New Zealand

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Susnjak, T en
dc.contributor.author Schumacher, C en
dc.contributor.author Ali, A en
dc.contributor.author Brook, A en
dc.contributor.author Geertsema, Paul en
dc.contributor.author Matthewson, J en
dc.contributor.author Owens, R en
dc.contributor.author Smith, J en
dc.date.accessioned 2019-09-20T07:36:46Z en
dc.date.issued 2019-05-22 en
dc.identifier.citation 22 May 2019. Knowledge Exchange Hub, Massey University, Auckland, New Zealand. 25 pages en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2292/47865 en
dc.description.abstract Global prosperity has been rising over the last decade, along with public debate about growing inequality and its poten- tially negative social and economic consequences. The purpose of our research is to create an annually updated com- posite index, The Shared Prosperity Index (SPI), to quantify and visualise how effectively prosperity has been shared in New Zealand over time as well as near-future predictions. Past measures of inequality have tended to focus on a single factor such as income distribution, but in recent years a number of composite indices have emerged internation- ally which have attempted to provide a multi-dimensional perspective regarding prosperity and collective wellbeing. The SPI is differentiated from the existing measures by emphasising the idea of shared rather than absolute prosper- ity and employing a particular focus on the New Zealand context. The SPI employs eight multivariate dimensions identified as drivers of shared prosperity: income and wealth, employment, housing, health, socio-economic wellbe- ing, education, safety and security, and general equality, and incorporates national and international data sources to compute a composite index. The SPI begins in 1982, and results show that the level of sharing from then reached a peak in New Zealand during the early to mid-1980s, before dropping sharply between 1987 and 1994, coinciding with cuts to government services and a move to a more open and less-regulated economy. Shared prosperity began slowly rising again until 2007 when it flattened out and trended downwards. In terms of eight individual SPI dimensions, we find most indices, while displaying some variability, reflect an overall decrease in sharing over their respective time-spans. The largest drop is in the Income and Wealth index, consistent with international findings on the growing gap between the rich and poor. The indices for two dimensions, Safety and Security and Education, have increased over their time-spans, although the Education index appears to be trending down. en
dc.publisher Knowledge Exchange Hub, Massey University en
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. en
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm en
dc.rights.uri http://www.sharedprosperity.co.nz/About#Terms%20of%20Use en
dc.subject Inequality, Prosperity, Wellbeing, Indices en
dc.title Towards a global index of shared prosperity: a case study on New Zealand en
dc.type Report en
dc.identifier.doi 10.33217/KEH/SharedProsperity/001/05.2019 en
dc.rights.holder Copyright: Massey University en
pubs.author-url http://www.sharedprosperity.co.nz/MainArticle en
pubs.place-of-publication Auckland, New Zealand en
pubs.publication-status Published online en
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/OpenAccess en
pubs.subtype Technical Report en
pubs.elements-id 774979 en
pubs.org-id Business and Economics en
pubs.org-id Accounting and Finance en
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2019-06-20 en


Files in this item

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics